Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities?

被引:253
作者
Grewal, I
Lewis, J
Flynn, T
Brown, J
Bond, J
Coast, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, MRC, Hlth Serv Res Collaborat, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
UK; quality of life; utility; capability;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.023
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Current UK policy with respect to the provision of health and social care for older people suggests that greater integration is required. Economists' attempts to assist resource allocation decisions, however, are very health focused, with concentration on the use of health-related quality of life measures. This paper reports an attempt to deter-mine attributes for a new index clearly focusing on quality of life for older people rather than health or other influences on quality of life. In-depth interviews were conducted with 40 purposively selected informants aged 65 and over in private households to explore their views about what is important to them in terms of quality of life. Data were analysed using Framework qualitative analysis. Initial discussions tended to concentrate upon factors influencing quality of life including activities, relationships, health, wealth and surroundings. Further probing and analysis suggested five conceptual attributes: attachment, role, enjoyment, security and control. The data also suggested that the quality of informants' lives was limited by the loss of ability to pursue these attributes. So, for example, it is not poor health in itself, which reduces quality of life, but the influence of that poor health upon each informant's ability to, say, be independent, that is important. Amartya Sen's work on functioning and capability is particularly pertinent here. Using this work, it is possible to interpret the five conceptual attributes as a set of functionings-important for older people in the UK in the 21st century - but noting that it is the capacity to achieve these functionings that appears to be of importance. This suggests that further development of this measure should focus on an index of capability rather than preference-based utility. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1891 / 1901
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Equity, capabilities and health
    Anand, P
    Dolan, P
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (02) : 219 - 222
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1992, EC MED HLTH CARE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2001, NAT SERV FRAM OLD PE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1996, Health measurement scales
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1991, A theory of human needs
  • [6] Boreham R, 2002, NATL SURVEYS NHS PAT
  • [7] Bowling A., 1997, MEASURING HLTH REV Q, V2nd
  • [8] The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36
    Brazier, J
    Roberts, J
    Deverill, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) : 271 - 292
  • [9] Brazier J., 1999, J Health Serv Res Policy, V4, P174, DOI [10.1177/135581969900400310, DOI 10.1177/135581969900400310]
  • [10] BROWN Jackie, 2004, Models of quality of life: A taxonomy, overview and systematic review of literature