Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation

被引:482
作者
Nosek, BA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Psychol, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
implicit attitudes; explicit attitudes; moderation; implicit-explicit correspondence; dual-process models;
D O I
10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.565
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Automatic and controlled modes of evaluation sometimes provide conflicting reports of the quality of social objects. This article presents evidence for 4 moderators of the relationship between automatic (implicit) and controlled (explicit) evaluations. Implicit and explicit preferences were measured for a variety of object pairs using a large sample. The average correlation was r = .36, and 52 of the 57 object pairs showed a significant positive correlation. Results of multilevel modeling analyses suggested that (a) implicit and explicit preferences are related, (b) the relationship varies as a function of the objects assessed, and (c) at least 4 variables moderate the relationship: self-presentation, evaluative strength. dimensionality, and distinctiveness. The variables moderated implicit-explicit correspondence across individuals and accounted for much of the observed variation across content domains. The resulting model of the relationship between automatic and controlled evaluative processes is.-rounded in personal experience with the targets of evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 584
页数:20
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   CONVICTION [J].
ABELSON, RP .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1988, 43 (04) :267-275
[2]   Attributions of implicit prejudice, or "would Jesse Jackson 'fail' the implicit association test?" [J].
Arkes, HR ;
Tetlock, PE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY, 2004, 15 (04) :257-278
[3]   Automatic stereotyping [J].
Banaji, MR ;
Hardin, CD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1996, 7 (03) :136-141
[4]  
Banaji MR, 2001, SCI CON SER, P117
[5]  
Bargh J.A., 1994, HDB SOCIAL COGNITION, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S00572-005-0022-9
[6]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[7]   Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength [J].
Bassili, JN .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (04) :637-653
[8]  
Bem D.J., 1972, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, V6, P1
[9]   Exploring the structure of strength-related attitude features: The relation between attitude importance and attitude accessibility [J].
Bizer, GY ;
Krosnick, JA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (04) :566-586
[10]   Automatic and controlled processes in stereotype priming [J].
Blair, IV ;
Banaji, MR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (06) :1142-1163