Photosynthetic responses of Populus przewalski subjected to drought stress

被引:112
作者
Yin, CY
Berninger, F
Li, CY
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Chengdu Inst Biol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Quebec, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Sch, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
关键词
chlorophyll fluorescence; dark respiration rate; diurnal changes; gas exchange; intercellular CO2 concentration; stomatal conductance; water use efficiency;
D O I
10.1007/s11099-005-0159-y
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Cuttings of P. przewalski were exposed to two different watering regimes which were watered to 100 and 25 % of field capacity (WW and WS, respectively). Drought stress not only significantly decreased net photosynthetic rate (P-N), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g(s)), efficiency of photosystem 2 (PS2) (F-v/F-m and yield), and increased intrinsic water use efficiency (WUEi) under controlled optimal conditions, but also altered the diurnal changes of gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and WUEi. On the other hand, WS also affected the P-N-photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) response curve. Under drought stress, P-N peak appeared earlier (at about 10:30 of local time) than under WW condition (at about 12:30). At midday, there was a depression in P-N for WS plants, but not for WW plants, and it could be caused by the whole microclimate, especially high temperature, low relative humidity, and high PAR. There were stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Stomatal limitation dominated in the morning, and low P-N at midday was caused by both stomatal and non-stomatal limitations, whereas non-stomatal limitation dominated in the afternoon. In addition, drought stress also increased compensation irradiance and dark respiration rate, and decreased saturation irradiance and maximum net photosynthetic rate. Thus drought stress decreased plant assimilation and increased dissimilation through affected gas exchange, the diurnal pattern of gas exchange, and photosynthesis-PAR response curve, thereby reducing plant growth and productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Photoinhibitory damage is modulated by the rate of photosynthesis and by the photosystem II light-harvesting chlorophyll antenna size [J].
Baroli, I ;
Melis, A .
PLANTA, 1998, 205 (02) :288-296
[2]   GAS-EXCHANGE CHARACTERISTICS OF POPULUS-TRICHOCARPA, POPULUS-DELTOIDES AND POPULUS-TRICHOCARPA X POPULUS-DELTOIDES CLONES [J].
BASSMAN, JH ;
ZWIER, JC .
TREE PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (02) :145-159
[3]  
Berry J. A., 1982, Photosynthesis. Volume II. Development, carbon metabolism, and productivity, P263
[4]  
Bjorkman O, 1981, ENCY PLANT PHYSL A, V12A, P57
[5]   CHLOROPLAST MOVEMENTS IN LEAVES - INFLUENCE ON CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE AND MEASUREMENTS OF LIGHT-INDUCED ABSORBENCY CHANGES RELATED TO DELTA-PH AND ZEAXANTHIN FORMATION [J].
BRUGNOLI, E ;
BJORKMAN, O .
PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH, 1992, 32 (01) :23-35
[6]  
Christy A. L., 1982, Photosynthesis. Volume II. Development, carbon metabolism, and productivity, P499
[7]   Photosynthesis and PSII functionality of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants [J].
Colom, MR ;
Vazzana, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2003, 49 (02) :135-144
[8]   Photosynthetic performance of two coffee species under drought [J].
Da Matta, FM ;
Maestri, M ;
Barros, RS .
PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 1997, 34 (02) :257-264
[9]  
Davies WJ, 1999, PHYSIOLOGICAL PLANT ECOLOGY, P67
[10]  
DIMARCO G, 1988, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V74, P385, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb00647.x