A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior

被引:809
作者
Bubeck, P. [1 ,2 ]
Botzen, W. J. W. [1 ]
Aerts, J. C. J. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, German Res Ctr Geosci GFZ, Sect Hydrol, Potsdam, Germany
关键词
Floods; mitigation; protection motivation theory (PMT); protective behavior; review; risk perception; PROTECTION-MOTIVATION THEORY; PRIVATE HOUSEHOLDS; EARTHQUAKE HAZARD; NATURAL HAZARDS; FEAR APPEALS; PREPAREDNESS; ADJUSTMENT; RESIDENTS; DISASTER; BUCHAREST;
D O I
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01783.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In flood risk management, a shift can be observed toward more integrated approaches that increasingly address the role of private households in implementing flood damage mitigation measures. This has resulted in a growing number of studies into the supposed positive relationship between individual flood risk perceptions and mitigation behavior. Our literature review shows, however, that, actually, this relationship is hardly observed in empirical studies. Two arguments are provided as an explanation. First, on the basis of protection motivation theory, a theoretical framework is discussed suggesting that individuals' high-risk perceptions need to be accompanied by coping appraisal to result in a protective response. Second, it is pointed out that possible feedback from already-adopted mitigation measures on risk perceptions has hardly been considered by current studies. In addition, we also provide a review of factors that drive precautionary behavior other than risk perceptions. It is found that factors such as coping appraisal are consistently related to mitigation behavior. We conclude, therefore, that the current focus on risk perceptions as a means to explain and promote private flood mitigation behavior is not supported on either theoretical or empirical grounds.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1495
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, NONSTR FLOOD PLAIN M
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1977, CALIF GEOL
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [4] Social vulnerability and seismic risk perception. Case study: the historic center of the Bucharest Municipality/Romania
    Armas, Iuliana
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2008, 47 (03) : 397 - 410
  • [5] Earthquake risk perception in Bucharest, Romania
    Armas, Iuliana
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (05) : 1223 - 1234
  • [6] Baana P.J., 2004, INT J RIVER BASIN MA, V2, P113, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226, 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635226]
  • [7] Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors
    Botzen, W. J. W.
    Aerts, J. C. J. H.
    van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2009, 45
  • [8] Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance
    Botzen, W. J. W.
    Aerts, J. C. J. H.
    van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (8-9) : 2265 - 2277
  • [9] Botzen WJW, INT EC REV IN PRESS
  • [10] Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area
    Bouwer, Laurens M.
    Bubeck, Philip
    Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (03): : 463 - 471