Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:50
作者
Fischer, Boris [1 ]
Engel, Nadja [1 ]
Fehr, Jean-Luc [1 ]
John, Hubert [1 ]
机构
[1] Klin Hirslanden, Zent Urol, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Complications; Prostatectomy; Robotic prostatectomy; da Vinci-Prostatectomy;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-008-0287-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Robotic radical prostatectomy claims optimal oncologic results, minimal morbidity and best outcomes of urinary continence and erection function. Potential benefits concerning side effects and complications compared to open radical prostatectomy are analysed. Out of 450 robotic radical prostatectomies performed, the last 210 patients aged 64 (41-78), PSA of 7.2 ng/ml (0.6-75) and body mass index of 27 (20-37) were assessed in detail using the Clavien's classification of surgical complications. In addition, a retrospective Medline based meta-analysis of 4,928 patients from eight centres involved was performed and compared to published data of open retropubic radical prostatectomy. In total 55/210 (26%) of the patients had complications, whereof 48/55 (87%) were minor (Clavien's grade I-IIIa). Complications (IIIb and IVa) with open reoperations occured in 7/210 (3%) of the patients including three bleedings, two incarcerated small bowels, one perforation of a sigmoid diverticle and one trocar hernia. No IVb or V complication occured. Overall robotic complication rate is very low and appears to be even less than in open series. Minor and major complications seem to decrease after 200 individual console surgeries. Robotic radical prostatectomy has proven to be a safe and reproducible surgical treatment with low morbidity. We encourage further trials using the same classification of complications to evaluate the morbidity of robotic prostatectomy conclusively in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 602
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: A comparison of one surgeon's outcomes [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Woo, D ;
Eichel, L ;
Lee, DI ;
Edwards, R ;
Skarecky, DW .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (05) :819-822
[2]  
Ahlering TE, 2006, J ENDOUROL, V20, pVP8
[3]  
Andonian S, 2008, CAN J UROL, V15, P3912
[4]   Intraoperative and perioperative morbidity of contemporary radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1243 patients: Results of a single center between 1999 and 2002 [J].
Augustin, H ;
Hammerer, P ;
Graefen, M ;
Palisaar, R ;
Noldus, J ;
Fernandez, S ;
Huland, H .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (02) :113-118
[5]   Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy - Assessment after 2766 procedures [J].
Badani, Ketan K. ;
Kaul, Sanjeev ;
Menon, Mani .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (09) :1951-1958
[6]   Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve [J].
Bhandari, A ;
McIntire, L ;
Kaul, SA ;
Hemal, AK ;
Peabody, JO ;
Menon, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (03) :915-918
[7]  
Borden Lester S Jr, 2007, Can J Urol, V14, P3499
[8]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[9]   Robotic radical prostatectomy: the European experience [J].
Cathelineau, X ;
Rozet, F ;
Vallancien, G .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2004, 31 (04) :693-+
[10]  
CLAVIEN PA, 1992, SURGERY, V111, P518