CO2 emissions from electricity generation in seven Asia-Pacific and North American countries: A decomposition analysis

被引:135
作者
Malla, Sunil [1 ]
机构
[1] Technol Consultancy Serv, Kathmandu, Nepal
关键词
Electricity generation; CO(2) emissions; Decomposition analysis; ENERGY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.010
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method of complete decomposition is used to examine the role of three factors (electricity production, electricity generation structure and energy intensity of electricity generation) affecting the evolution of CO(2) emissions from electricity generation in seven countries. These seven countries together generated 58% of global electricity and they are responsible for more than two-thirds of global CO(2) emissions from electricity generation in 2005. The analysis shows production effect as the major factor responsible for rise in CO(2) emissions during the period 1990-2005. The generation structure effect also contributed in CO(2) emissions increase, although at a slower rate. In contrary, the energy intensity effect is responsible for modest reduction in CO(2) emissions during this period. Over the 2005-2030 period, production effect remains the key factor responsible for increase in emissions and energy intensity effect is responsible for decrease in emissions. Unlike in the past, generation structure effect contributes significant decrease in emissions. However, the degree of influence of these factors affecting changes in CO(2) emissions vary from country to country. The analysis also shows that there is a potential of efficiency improvement of fossil-fuel-fired power plants and its associated co-benefits among these countries. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Negative-value problems of the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Liu, Na .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :739-742
[2]   Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Liu, Na .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (01) :238-246
[3]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[4]   Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Zhang, FQ ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY, 1998, 23 (06) :489-495
[5]   Boundary problem in carbon emission decomposition [J].
Ang, BW ;
Choi, KH .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (13) :1201-1205
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Energy technology perspectives: scenarios and strategies to 2050
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WORLD EN OUTL 2007 C
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, WORLD POP PROSP 2006
[9]  
[Buendia L.EgglestonH.S. IPCC. IPCC.], 2006, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme
[10]   A residual-free decomposition of the sources of carbon dioxide emissions: a case of the Korean industries [J].
Chung, HS ;
Rhee, HC .
ENERGY, 2001, 26 (01) :15-30