Suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity with inhaled flunisolide and fluticasone propionate in adult asthma patients

被引:67
作者
Casale, TB
Nelson, HS
Stricker, WE
Raff, H
Newman, KB
机构
[1] Creighton Univ, Dept Med, Div Allergy Immunol, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[2] Natl Jewish Med & Res Ctr, Dept Med, Denver, CO USA
[3] Clin Res Ozarks, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Med Coll Wisconsin, St Lukes Med Ctr, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[5] Forest Pharmaceut Inc, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62918-3
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, a potential systemic effect of inhaled corticosteroid therapy, can be quantified by monitoring serum, urinary, and salivary cortisol levels. Objectives: 1) Compare the effects on HPA axis of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide and fluticasone propionate versus placebo and oral prednisone. 2) Estimate dose-potency ratio for HPA-axis suppression. Methods: Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label, 21-day trial. Active regimens were flunisolide 500 and 1,000 lag, twice daily; fluticasone propionate 110, 220, 330, and 440 mug, twice daily; and prednisone, 7.5 mg daily. Enrolled patients were nonsmokers, 18 to 50 years of age, with persistent mild-to-moderate asthma and had not used oral, nasal, or inhaled corticosteroids for 6 months before study. Main outcome measures were area under serum cortisol concentration curve for 22 hours (AUC(0-22h)); 24-hour urinary cortisol level; and 8 AM salivary cortisol level. Results: One hundred fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to active treatment or placebo; 125 patients completed the study and were at least 80% compliant with their regimens. Both fluticasone propionate and flunisolide caused dose-dependent suppression of HPA axis, which was statistically greater for fluticasone propionate (P = 0.0003). Dose-potency ratio showed 4.4 times more serum-cortisol suppression/microgram increase in dose with fluticasone propionate than with flunisolide. Diurnal pattern of serum cortisol suppression was persistent with fluticasone propionate and "remitting" with flunisolide. Salivary and urinary cortisol data were qualitatively similar to serum cortisol results. Conclusions: Fluticasone caused significantly more suppression of HPA axis than flunisolide. Flunisolide may provide a safe option for patients with asthma requiring long-term inhaled corticosteroid therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 385
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Comparison of pharmacokinetics and systemic effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma and healthy volunteers: a randomised crossover study [J].
Brutsche, MH ;
Brutsche, IC ;
Munavvar, M ;
Langley, SJ ;
Masterson, CM ;
Daley-Yates, PT ;
Brown, R ;
Custovic, A ;
Woodcock, A .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9229) :556-561
[2]   Dose-response of inhaled drugs in asthma - An update [J].
Clark, DJ ;
Lipworth, BJ .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1997, 32 (01) :58-74
[3]   Evaluation of the effect of a large volume spacer on the systemic bioactivity of fluticasone propionate metered-dose inhaler [J].
Dempsey, OJ ;
Wilson, AM ;
Coutie, WJR ;
Lipworth, BJ .
CHEST, 1999, 116 (04) :935-940
[4]   EFFECT OF AN INHALED CORTICOSTEROID ON AIRWAY INFLAMMATION AND SYMPTOMS IN ASTHMA [J].
DJUKANOVIC, R ;
WILSON, JW ;
BRITTEN, KM ;
WILSON, SJ ;
WALLS, AF ;
ROCHE, WR ;
HOWARTH, PH ;
HOLGATE, ST .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1992, 145 (03) :669-674
[5]   Pharmacological factors that influence the choice of inhaled corticosteroids [J].
Edsbäcker, S .
DRUGS, 1999, 58 (Suppl 4) :7-16
[6]  
KRAFT M, 2000, ASTHM IMM 56 ANN M D
[7]   SALIVARY CORTISOL MEASUREMENT - A PRACTICAL APPROACH TO ASSESS PITUITARY-ADRENAL-FUNCTION [J].
LAUDAT, MH ;
CERDAS, S ;
FOURNIER, C ;
GUIBAN, D ;
GUILHAUME, B ;
LUTON, JP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1988, 66 (02) :343-348
[8]  
LAW CM, 1986, LANCET, V1, P942
[10]   Systemic adverse effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy - A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Lipworth, BJ .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (09) :941-955