Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector

被引:156
作者
Bos, J. J. [1 ]
Brown, R. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Geog & Environm Sci, Ctr Water Sensit Cities, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Governance experimentation; Transition management; Transition experiments; Learning; Critical factors; Urban water; ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; INNOVATION; POLICY; COMPLEXITY; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS; TRANSFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The necessity of a shift towards more sustainable urban water management practice is widely acknowledged and advocated. Experimentation that enables social learning is regarded of high importance for realising such a change. For instance, literature on Transition Management suggests that governance, as opposed to purely technical, experimentation is considered a critical factor in achieving a socio-technical transition. When analysing the water sector it becomes clear that modern urban water systems have almost exclusively focused upon technological experimentation with little attention directed towards the importance of governance experimentation for social learning. Empirically little is known neither on how governance experimentation actually unfolds nor about its effectiveness for socio-technical transitions. This research paper presents a critical analysis of a unique process of governance experimentation within the Australian urban water sector which generated sufficient social-political capital to change an established water governance framework. Conclusions of this research reveal some theoretically conjectured processes, like deepening, broadening and scaling-up, are found in this contemporary, real-life example. Furthermore, factors which influenced the success of this governance experimentation process are revealed and the role of various forms of learning therein is described. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1340 / 1353
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS MONASH U
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Emergence
[3]   COMPETING TECHNOLOGIES, INCREASING RETURNS, AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1989, 99 (394) :116-131
[4]  
Beck U., 1992, RISK SOC NEW MODERNI
[5]  
Beers P., 2010, SOCIAL LEARNING MULT
[6]   Technological regimes, path dependency and the environment [J].
Berkhout, F .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2002, 12 (01) :1-4
[7]  
BLAIKIE N, 2010, DESIGNING SOCIAL RES
[8]  
Brown R., 2001, Proceedings of frontiers in urban water management, Marseilles, France. 18-29 June 2001, P251
[9]   Implementation impediments to institutionalising the practice of sustainable urban water management [J].
Brown, R. R. ;
Sharp, L. ;
Ashley, R. M. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 54 (6-7) :415-422
[10]   Delivering sustainable urban water management: a review of the hurdles we face [J].
Brown, R. R. ;
Farrelly, M. A. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 59 (05) :839-846