Effect of surgical debulking on survival in stage IV ovarian cancer

被引:78
作者
Liu, PC
Benjamin, I
Morgan, MA
King, SA
Mikuta, JJ
Rubin, SC
机构
[1] Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Univ. of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia
关键词
D O I
10.1006/gyno.1996.4396
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In order to determine whether optimal surgical debulking in Stage TV epithelial ovarian cancer impacts survival, a retrospective review of patients treated at the University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center (UPCC) from 1984 to 1995 diagnosed with Stage TV epithelial ovarian cancer was performed. Data were collected regarding grade, histology, reason for allocation to Stage TV, extent of surgery performed and residual disease at initial staging procedure, major perioperative complications, first-line chemotherapy regimen, length of inpatient hospital stay, outcome at second-look laparotomy, follow-up, and survival. For the purposes of this study, optimal cytoreduction was defined as a residual disease of 2 cm or less. Forty-seven patients with Stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer identified in the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) Database at UPCC are included. Fourteen of 47 (30%) were optimally cytoreduced at the time of their staging procedure. Twenty-six of 47 (55%) were deemed Stage IV by virtue of positive pleural effusion cytology only. Twenty-one of 47 (45%) had intraparenchymal Liver involvement or metastatic disease outside of the abdomen. The median survival of the suboptimally debulked group was 17 months, while median survival in the optimal group was 37 months (P = 0.0295). These data suggest that Stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer patients with less than 2 cm residual disease have a survival advantage over patients with greater than 2 cm residual. (C) 1997 Academic Press
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 8
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Analysis of binary data
[2]   DATABASE-MANAGEMENT FOR A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY SERVICE [J].
BENJAMIN, I ;
NOUMOFF, JS ;
CARLSON, JA ;
GIUNTOLI, RL ;
MORGAN, M ;
MIKUTA, JJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 38 (03) :431-436
[3]   A RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING CISPLATIN PLUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE VERSUS CISPLATIN, DOXORUBICIN, AND CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
CONTE, PF ;
BRUZZONE, M ;
CHIARA, S ;
SERTOLI, MR ;
DAGA, MG ;
RUBAGOTTI, A ;
CONIO, A ;
RUVOLO, M ;
ROSSO, R ;
SANTI, L ;
CARNINO, F ;
COTTINI, M ;
MOSSETTI, C ;
GUERCIO, E ;
GATTI, M ;
SILIQUINI, PN ;
PRELATO, ML ;
DURANDO, C ;
GIACCONE, G ;
CALCIATI, A ;
FARININI, D ;
CENTONZE, M ;
RUGIATI, S ;
PARODI, G ;
MESSINEO, M ;
STORACE, A ;
BERNARDINI, G ;
MISURALE, F ;
ALESSANDRI, S ;
CASINI, M ;
RAGNI, N ;
FOGLIA, G ;
BENTIVOGLIO, G ;
PESCETTO, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (06) :965-971
[4]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[5]  
Curtin J., 1995, Gynecologic Oncology, V56, P129
[6]   STAGE-III EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER - THE ROLE OF MAXIMAL SURGICAL REDUCTION [J].
DELGADO, G ;
ORAM, DH ;
PETRILLI, ES .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1984, 18 (03) :293-298
[7]   THE ROLE OF CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF STAGE-IV EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA [J].
GOODMAN, HM ;
HARLOW, BL ;
SHEETS, EE ;
MUTO, MG ;
BROOKS, S ;
STELLER, M ;
KNAPP, RC ;
BERKOWITZ, RS .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 46 (03) :367-371
[8]  
Griffiths C T, 1975, Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, V42, P101
[9]  
GRIFFITHS CT, 1979, CANCER TREAT REP, V63, P235
[10]   EXTENSIVE PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
GUIDOZZI, F ;
BALL, JHS .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1994, 53 (03) :326-330