A quantitative analysis of the causes of the global climate change research distribution

被引:59
作者
Pasgaard, M. [1 ]
Strange, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Dept Food & Resource Econ, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Sci, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
来源
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS | 2013年 / 23卷 / 06期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Knowledge production; Adaptation; Stability; Policy; Vulnerability; BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS; SCIENCE; VULNERABILITY; CONSERVATION; ADAPTATION; IMPACT; POLICY; OUTPUT; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
During the last decades of growing scientific, political and public attention to global climate change, it has become increasingly clear that the present and projected impacts from climate change, and the ability adapt to the these changes, are not evenly distributed across the globe. This paper investigates whether the need for knowledge on climate changes in the most vulnerable regions of the world is met by the supply of knowledge measured by scientific research publications from the last decade. A quantitative analysis of more than 15,000 scientific publications from 197 countries investigates the distribution of climate change research and the potential causes of this distribution. More than 13 explanatory variables representing vulnerability, geographical, demographical, economical and institutional indicators are included in the analysis. The results show that the supply of climate change knowledge is biased toward richer countries, which are more stable and less corrupt, have higher school enrolment and expenditures on research and development, emit more carbon and are less vulnerable to climate change. Similarly, the production of knowledge, analyzed by author affiliations, is skewed away from the poorer, fragile and more vulnerable regions of the world. A quantitative keywords analysis of all publications shows that different knowledge domains and research themes dominate across regions, reflecting the divergent global concerns in relation to climate change. In general, research on climate change in more developed countries tend to focus on mitigation aspects, while in developing countries issues of adaptation and human or social impacts (droughts and diseases) dominate. Based on these findings, this paper discusses the gap between the supply of and need for climate change knowledge, the potential causes and constraints behind the imbalanced distribution of knowledge, and its implications for adaptation and policymaking. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1684 / 1693
页数:10
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?
    Adger, W. Neil
    Dessai, Suraje
    Goulden, Marisa
    Hulme, Mike
    Lorenzoni, Irene
    Nelson, Donald R.
    Naess, Lars Otto
    Wolf, Johanna
    Wreford, Anita
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 93 (3-4) : 335 - 354
  • [2] The Structure and Development of Polar Research (1981-2007): a Publication-Based Approach
    Aksnes, Dag W.
    Hessen, Dag O.
    [J]. ARCTIC ANTARCTIC AND ALPINE RESEARCH, 2009, 41 (02) : 155 - 163
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Regression Analysis of Count Data
  • [4] [Anonymous], KNOWING NATURE TRANS
  • [5] [Anonymous], COMP MACR CONT REG G
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, STERN REV EC CLIMATE
  • [7] AOSIS, 2011, LIST MEMB ALL SMALL
  • [8] Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities:: The limits of existing databases
    Archambault, Eric
    Vignola-Gagne, Etienne
    Cote, Gregoire
    Lariviere, Vincent
    Gingras, Yves
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (03) : 329 - 342
  • [9] Cameron A. C., 2005, Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications
  • [10] The effect of democracy and press freedom on corruption: an empirical test
    Chowdhury, SK
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2004, 85 (01) : 93 - 101