Mild skin photosensitivity in cancer patients following injection of Photochlor (2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a; HPPH) for photodynamic therapy

被引:92
作者
Bellnier, DA
Greco, WR
Nava, H
Loewen, GM
Oseroff, AR
Dougherty, TJ
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Cell Stress Biol, Photodynam Therapy Ctr, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[3] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Med, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Dermatol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
关键词
HPPH; photochemotherapy; photodynamic therapy; photofrin; phototoxicity; solar simulator;
D O I
10.1007/s00280-005-0015-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To measure skin photosensitivity in cancer patients infused with the new second-generation photodynamic sensitizer Photochlor (2-[1-hexyloxyethyl]-2-devinyl pyropheophorbide-a). A major disadvantage of using the clinically approved photosensitizer Photofrin is potentially prolonged and sometimes severe cutaneous phototoxicity. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients enrolled in Phases 1 and 2 clinical trials underwent two or more exposures to four graded doses (44.4, 66.6, 88.8 or 133.2 J/cm(2)) of artificial solar-spectrum light (SSL) before and after administration of Photochlor at a dose of 2.5, 3, 4, 5 or 6 mg/m(2). Results: The most severe skin response, experienced by only six of the subjects, was limited to erythema without edema and could only be elicited by exposure to the highest light dose. Conversely, eight subjects had no discernible reaction to SSL at any light dose. For nearly all the patients, the peak skin response was obtained when the interval between sensitizer injection and exposure to SSL was I day and, generally, their sensitivity to SSL decreased with increasing sensitizer-light interval. For example, a 2-day sensitizer-SSL interval resulted in less severe reactions than those obtained with the 1-day interval in 79% of the subjects, while 90% of the subjects exposed to SSL 3 days after Photochlor infusion had responses that were less severe than those obtained with either the 1- or 2-day sensitizer-SSL interval. Conclusions: Photochlor, at clinically effective antitumor doses, causes only mild skin photosensitivity that declines rapidly over a few days.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 45
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Bellnier D A, 1996, J Clin Laser Med Surg, V14, P311
[2]   MURINE PHARMACOKINETICS AND ANTITUMOR EFFICACY OF THE PHOTODYNAMIC SENSITIZER 2-[1-HEXYLOXYETHYL]-2-DEVINYL PYROPHEOPHORBIDE-A [J].
BELLNIER, DA ;
HENDERSON, BW ;
PANDEY, RK ;
POTTER, WR ;
DOUGHERTY, TJ .
JOURNAL OF PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY B-BIOLOGY, 1993, 20 (01) :55-61
[3]  
Bellnier DA, 2003, CANCER RES, V63, P1806
[4]   Photodynamic therapy for cholangiocarcinoma [J].
Berr, F .
SEMINARS IN LIVER DISEASE, 2004, 24 (02) :177-187
[5]   CUTANEOUS PHOTOTOXIC OCCURRENCES IN PATIENTS RECEIVING PHOTOFRIN [J].
DOUGHERTY, TJ ;
COOPER, MT ;
MANG, TS .
LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 1990, 10 (05) :485-488
[6]  
DOUGHERTY TJ, 2003, BIOMEDICAL PHOTONICS
[7]   New light on the brain: The role of photosensitizing agents and laser light in the management of invasive intracranial tumors [J].
Eljamel, MS .
TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2003, 2 (04) :303-309
[8]   THE VALIDITY AND PRACTICALITY OF SUN-REACTIVE SKIN TYPE-I THROUGH TYPE-VI [J].
FITZPATRICK, TB .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1988, 124 (06) :869-871
[9]   Phase II trial of pleural photodynamic therapy and surgery for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with pleural spread [J].
Friedberg, JS ;
Mick, R ;
Stevenson, JP ;
Zhu, T ;
Busch, TM ;
Shin, D ;
Smith, D ;
Culligan, M ;
Dimofte, A ;
Glatstein, E ;
Hahn, SM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (11) :2192-2201
[10]   Topical photodynamic therapy in clinical dermatology [J].
Kormeili, T ;
Yamauchi, PS ;
Lowe, NJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 150 (06) :1061-1069