Doing for others on the job: The affective requirements of service work, gender, and emotional well-being

被引:59
作者
Bulan, HF [1 ]
Erickson, RJ [1 ]
Wharton, AS [1 ]
机构
[1] WASHINGTON STATE UNIV,PULLMAN,WA 99164
关键词
D O I
10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0224p
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
American workers face an economy that has shifted from the industrial production of goods to the post-industrial production of services. For many, job success depends on one's ability to produce speech, action, and emotion that symbolize a willingness to ''do for'' the customer or client. Such expectations comprise the affective requirements of today's service-sector jobs. Using a sample of employees within the health and banking industries, we examine the effects of affective requirements, interactive work, and other occupational conditions on women's and men's job-related emotional well-being. We find that when one's job success depends on being able to handle people well, both women and men tend to experience higher levels of inauthenticity and fewer positive feelings about their work. However, spending more time at work interacting with others and having greater control over that work tends to have the opposite effect on well-being. We also find that job involvement operates quite differently for women and men in ways that are sensitive to service-sector work conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 256
页数:22
相关论文
共 65 条
[11]  
Bell Daniel., 1976, The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism
[12]  
BOORSTIN DJ, 1987, IMAGE GUIDE PSEUDO-E
[13]  
BOWEN DE, 1988, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V10, P43
[14]  
Braverman Harry., 1998, LABOR MONOPOLY CAPIT, V25th
[15]   A REVIEW AND AN INTEGRATION OF RESEARCH ON JOB BURNOUT [J].
CORDES, CL ;
DOUGHERTY, TW .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1993, 18 (04) :621-656
[16]   INVISIBLE WORK [J].
DANIELS, AK .
SOCIAL PROBLEMS, 1987, 34 (05) :403-415
[17]  
DeVault Marjorie L., 1991, FEEDING FAMILY SOCIA
[18]  
Durkheim E., 1964, DIVISION LABOR SOC
[19]  
Edwards R., 1979, Contested Terrain
[20]  
England P, 1992, Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence