Facet joint kinematics and injury mechanisms during simulated whiplash

被引:164
作者
Pearson, AM [1 ]
Ivancic, PC [1 ]
Ito, S [1 ]
Panjabi, MM [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed & Rehabil, Biomech Res Lab, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
spine biomechanics; facet joint; capsular ligament; whiplash; injury mechanism;
D O I
10.1097/01.BRS.0000090836.50508.F7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Facet joint kinematics and capsular ligament strains were evaluated during simulated whiplash of whole cervical spine specimens with muscle force replication. Objectives. To describe facet joint kinematics, including facet joint compression and facet joint sliding, and quantify peak capsular ligament strain during simulated whiplash. Summary of Background Data. Clinical studies have implicated the facet joint as a source of chronic neck pain in whiplash patients. Prior in vivo and in vitro biomechanical studies have evaluated facet joint compression and excessive capsular ligament strain as potential injury mechanisms. No study has comprehensively evaluated facet joint compression, facet joint sliding, and capsular ligament strain at all cervical levels during multiple whiplash simulation accelerations. Methods. The whole cervical spine specimens with muscle force replication model and a bench-top trauma sled were used in an incremental trauma protocol to simulate whiplash of increasing severity. Peak facet joint compression ( displacement of the upper facet surface towards the lower facet surface), facet joint sliding ( displacement of the upper facet surface along the lower facet surface), and capsular ligament strains were calculated and compared to the physiologic limits determined during intact flexibility testing. Results. Peak facet joint compression was greatest at C4 - C5, reaching a maximum of 2.6 mm during the 5 g simulation. Increases over physiologic limits ( P < 0.05) were initially observed during the 3.5 g simulation. In general, peak facet joint sliding and capsular ligament strains were largest in the lower cervical spine and increased with impact acceleration. Capsular ligament strain reached a maximum of 39.9% at C6 - C7 during the 8 g simulation. Conclusions. Facet joint components may be at risk for injury due to facet joint compression during rear-impact accelerations of 3.5 g and above. Capsular ligaments are at risk for injury at higher accelerations.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 397
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
THE EFFECTS OF CONTROLLED MECHANICAL LOADING ON GROUP-II, GROUP-III, AND GROUP-IV AFFERENT UNITS FROM THE LUMBAR FACET JOINT AND SURROUNDING TISSUE - AN INVITRO STUDY [J].
AVRAMOV, AI ;
CAVANAUGH, JM ;
OZAKTAY, CA ;
GETCHELL, TV ;
KING, AI .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (10) :1464-1471
[2]
ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASOUND APPEARANCE OF WATERMELON STOMACH [J].
BARNARD, GF ;
COLBY, JM ;
SALTZMAN, JR ;
KRIMS, PE ;
LI, L ;
BANNER, BF .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1995, 20 (01) :26-28
[3]
THE PREVALENCE OF CHRONIC CERVICAL ZYGAPOPHYSIAL JOINT PAIN AFTER WHIPLASH [J].
BARNSLEY, L ;
LORD, SM ;
WALLIS, BJ ;
BOGDUK, N .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (01) :20-25
[4]
WHIPLASH INJURY [J].
BARNSLEY, L ;
LORD, S ;
BOGDUK, N .
PAIN, 1994, 58 (03) :283-307
[5]
COMPARATIVE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC BLOCKS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CERVICAL ZYGAPOPHYSIAL JOINT PAIN [J].
BARNSLEY, L ;
LORD, S ;
BOGDUK, N .
PAIN, 1993, 55 (01) :99-106
[6]
Braakman R., 1971, Injuries of the cervical spineed
[7]
Cavanaugh JM, 1996, LOW BACK PAIN: A SCIENTIFIC AND CLINICAL OVERVIEW, P583
[8]
Whiplash syndrome - Kinematic factors influencing pain patterns [J].
Cusick, JF ;
Pintar, FA ;
Yoganandan, N .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (11) :1252-1258
[9]
Chronic changes in rabbit retro-patellar cartilage and subchondral bone after blunt impact loading of the patellofemoral joint [J].
Ewers, BJ ;
Weaver, BT ;
Sevensma, ET ;
Haut, RC .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2002, 20 (03) :545-550
[10]
Lumbar spinal strains associated with whiplash injury - A cadaveric study [J].
Fast, A ;
Sosner, J ;
Begeman, P ;
Thomas, MA ;
Chiu, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2002, 81 (09) :645-650