A social-ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations

被引:413
作者
Ban, Natalie C. [1 ]
Mills, Morena [1 ,2 ]
Tam, Jordan [3 ]
Hicks, Christina C. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Klain, Sarah [3 ]
Stoeckl, Natalie [4 ,5 ]
Bottrill, Madeleine C. [6 ,7 ]
Levine, Jordan [3 ]
Pressey, Robert L. [1 ]
Satterfield, Terre [3 ]
Chan, Kai M. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Australian Res Council, Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Global Change Inst, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
[4] James Cook Univ, Cairns Inst, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[5] James Cook Univ, Sch Business, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Australian Res Council, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[7] Conservat Int, Arlington, VA USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; MARINE CONSERVATION; COMMUNITY; AREAS; IMPLEMENTATION; OPPORTUNISM; MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; COSTS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1890/110205
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Many conservation plans remain unimplemented, in part because of insufficient consideration of the social processes that influence conservation decisions. Complementing social considerations with an integrated understanding of the ecology of a region can result in a more complete conservation approach. We suggest that linking conservation planning to a social-ecological systems (SES) framework can lead to a more thorough understanding of human-environment interactions and more effective integration of social considerations. By characterizing SES as a set of subsystems, and their interactions with each other and with external factors, the SES framework can improve our understanding of the linkages between social and ecological influences on the environment. Using this framework can help to identify socially and ecologically focused conservation actions that will benefit ecosystems and human communities, and assist in the development of more consistent evidence for evaluating conservation actions by comparing conservation case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 202
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Gibson, CC .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (04) :629-649
[2]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems building resilience for complexity and change
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, SUSTAINABLE RURAL LI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, CONTESTED NATURE PRO
[6]   From Publications to Public Actions: When Conservation Biologists Bridge the Gap between Research and Implementation [J].
Arlettaz, Raphael ;
Schaub, Michael ;
Fournier, Jerome ;
Reichlin, Thomas S. ;
Sierro, Antoine ;
Watson, James E. M. ;
Braunisch, Veronika .
BIOSCIENCE, 2010, 60 (10) :835-842
[7]   Comparing and Integrating Community-Based and Science-Based Approaches to Prioritizing Marine Areas for Protection [J].
Ban, Natalie C. ;
Picard, Chris R. ;
Vincent, Amanda C. J. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (04) :899-910
[8]  
Ban NC, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
[9]   Spatial socioeconomic data as a cost in systematic marine conservation planning [J].
Ban, Natalie Corinna ;
Klein, Carissa Joy .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2009, 2 (05) :206-215
[10]  
Blaikie P., 1994, AT RISK NATURAL HAZA