A comparison of polymerization by light-emitting diode and halogen-based light-curing units

被引:107
作者
Dunn, WJ
Bush, AC
机构
[1] Dept Gen Dent, Lackland AFB, TX 78236 USA
[2] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Clin Res Squadron, Lackland AFB, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0173
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background. Light-emitting diode, or LED, technology provides certain advantages over halogen-based light polymerization of resin-based composites. The authors investigated the adequacy of cure of LED light-curing units, 1 or LCUs. Methods. The authors used two halogen-based lightcuring units (Optilux 400 and 501, Demetron Research Corp., Danbury, Conn.) and two commercially available LED LCUs (LumaCure, LumaLite, Spring Valley, Calif., and VersaLux, Centrix, Shelton, Conn.) to polymerize top surfaces of hybrid (Filtek Z-250, 3M, St. Paul, Minn.) and microfilled (Renamel, Cosmedent, Chicago) resin-based composite specimens. Specimens were indented on their top and bottom surfaces with a Knoop hardness tester and measured for hardness. Bottom:top hardness ratios determined the percentage of cure. The authors separated the data into eight groups (two composites cured with four different lights) with 15 observations per group, for a total sample size of 120, Results. The authors compared composites and curing lights by a two-way analysis of variance, and results indicated significant main effects. The main effect of composite was statistically significant (P < .0001) when microfilled composite was compared with hybrid composite, regardless of curing light, for all top d b h d an ottom ar ness measurements, with the hybrid producing much higher hardness measurements overall. The main effect of light was significant as well (P <.0001), regardless of composite type, with the two halogen-based lights producing harder top and bottom composite surfaces than the two LED LCUs. l i Th l Conc us ons. e ight output of commercially available diodes for resin-based composite polymerization still requires improvement to rival the adequacy of cure of halogen-based LCUs. Additional studies are necessary. Clinical Implications. Commercially available LED LCUs were introduced just in the past year. However they may not ade, quately polymerize resin-based composites, which can lead to restoration failures and adverse pulpal responses to unpolymerized monomers.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 341
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Althoff O, 2000, AM J DENT, V13, p77D
[2]   SOME FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DEPTH OF CURE OF VISIBLE LIGHT-ACTIVATED COMPOSITE RESINS [J].
ATMADJA, G ;
BRYANT, RW .
AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 1990, 35 (03) :213-218
[3]   EVALUATING INTENSITY OUTPUT OF CURING LIGHTS IN PRIVATE DENTAL OFFICES [J].
BARGHI, N ;
BERRY, T ;
HATTON, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 125 (07) :992-996
[4]  
Blankenau R J, 1991, Am J Dent, V4, P40
[5]   THE CURING POTENTIAL OF LIGHT-ACTIVATED COMPOSITE RESIN LUTING AGENTS [J].
BREEDING, LC ;
DIXON, DL ;
CAUGHMAN, WF .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1991, 65 (04) :512-518
[6]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHADE AND DEPTH OF CURE FOR LIGHT-ACTIVATED DENTAL COMPOSITE RESINS [J].
FERRACANE, JL ;
ADAY, P ;
MATSUMOTO, H ;
MARKER, VA .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1986, 2 (02) :80-84
[7]  
FUJIBAYASHI K, 1996, J JAP DENT PRES ACAD, V39, P180
[8]  
FUJIBAYASHI K, 1998, DENT JPN, V34, P49
[9]  
HAITZ RH, 1995, HDB OPTICS, V2
[10]   Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs) [J].
Jandt, KD ;
Mills, RW ;
Blackwell, GB ;
Ashworth, SH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2000, 16 (01) :41-47