Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms

被引:97
作者
Brake, GMT [1 ]
Karssemeijer, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Nijmegen, Dept Radiol, NL-6525 GA Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
computer-aided diagnosis; mammography; scale; tumor detection;
D O I
10.1109/42.790462
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Scale is an important issue in the automated detection of masses in mammograms, due to the range of possible sizes masses can have. In this work, it was examined if detection of masses can be done at a single scale, or whether it is more appropriate to use the output of the detection method at different scales in a multiscale scheme. Three different pixel-based mass-detection methods were used for this purpose. The first method is based an convolution of a mammogram with the Laplacian of a Gaussian, the second method is based on correlation with a model of a mass, and the third is a new approach, based on statistical analysis of gradient-orientation maps. Experiments with simulated masses indicated that little can be gained by applying the methods at a number of scales. These results mere confirmed by experiments on a set of 71 cases (132 mammograms) containing a malignant tumor. The performance of each method in a multiscale scheme was similar to the performance at the optimal single scale. A slight improvement was found for the correlation method when the output of different scales was combined. This was especially evident at low specificity levels. The correlation method and the gradient-orientation-analysis method have similar performances. A sensitivity of approximately 75% is reached at a level of one false positive per image. The method based on convolution with the Laplacian of the Gaussian performed considerably worse, in both a single and multiscale scheme.
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 639
页数:12
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] ASTLEY S, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1905, P716, DOI 10.1117/12.148683
  • [2] THE ROLE OF THE REFERENCE RADIOLOGIST - ESTIMATES OF INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT AND POTENTIAL DELAY IN CANCER-DETECTION IN THE NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY
    BAINES, CJ
    MCFARLANE, DV
    MILLER, AB
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (09) : 971 - 976
  • [3] ANALYSIS OF CANCERS MISSED AT SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY
    BIRD, RE
    WALLACE, TW
    YANKASKAS, BC
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) : 613 - 617
  • [4] BRZAKOVIC D, 1994, STATE ART DIGITAL MA, V9, P103
  • [5] IMPROVEMENT IN RADIOLOGISTS DETECTION OF CLUSTERED MICROCALCIFICATIONS ON MAMMOGRAMS - THE POTENTIAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS
    CHAN, HP
    DOI, K
    VYBORNY, CJ
    SCHMIDT, RA
    METZ, CE
    LAM, KL
    OGURA, T
    WU, YZ
    MACMAHON, H
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (10) : 1102 - 1110
  • [6] Groshong BR, 1996, INT CONGR SER, V1119, P361
  • [7] PREVIOUS MAMMOGRAMS IN PATIENTS WITH IMPALPABLE BREAST-CARCINOMA - RETROSPECTIVE VS BLINDED INTERPRETATION
    HARVEY, JA
    FAJARDO, LL
    INNIS, CA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 161 (06) : 1167 - 1172
  • [8] HUTT IW, 1994, INT CONGR SER, V1069, P389
  • [9] Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms
    Karssemeijer, N
    teBrake, GM
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (05) : 611 - 619
  • [10] KARSSEMEIJER N, 1994, INT CONGR SER, V1069, P211