Future land use and concerns about the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: A survey of urban dwellers

被引:6
作者
Burger, J [1 ]
Roush, D
Wartenberg, D
Gochfeld, M
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Life Sci, Ecol & Evolut Grad Program, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, CRESP, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci Inst, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[3] Environm Sci & Res Fdn, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 USA
[4] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci Inst, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
future land use; perceptions; recreation; hazardous waste; Department of Energy; Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory;
D O I
10.1007/s002679900253
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We examined environmental concerns and future land-use preferences of 487 people attending the Boise River Festival in Boise, Idaho, USA, about the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL), owned by the US Department of Energy (DOE). We were particularly interested in the perceptions of urban dwellers living at some distance from the facility, since attitudes and perceptions are usually examined for people living near such facilities. More than 50% of the people were most worried about contamination and about waste storage and transport, another 23% were concerned about human health and accidents and spills, and the rest listed other concerns such as jobs and the economy or education. When given a list of possible concerns, accidents and spills, storage of current nuclear materials, and storage of additional nuclear materials were rated the highest. Thus both open-ended and structured questions identified nuclear storage and accidents and spills as the most important concerns, even for people living far from a DOE site. The highest rated future land uses were: National Environmental Research Park, recreation (including hiking, camping, fishing and hunting), and returning the land to the Shoshone-Bannock tribes; the lowest rated future land uses were homes and increased nuclear waste storage. These relative rankings are similar to those obtained for other Idahoans living closer to the site and for people living near the Savannah River Site, another DOE facility in South Carolina. The concern expressed about accidents and spills and waste storage translated into a desire not to see additional waste brought to INEEL and a low rating for using INEEL for building homes.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 551
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, How to conduct interviews by telephone and in person
[2]  
[Anonymous], METHODS ASSESS EFFEC
[3]   POLITICS AND SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE - SCIENTISTS, RISK PERCEPTION, AND NUCLEAR WASTE POLICY [J].
BARKE, RP ;
JENKINSSMITH, HC .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1993, 13 (04) :425-439
[4]  
Boiko PE, 1996, RISK ANAL, V16, P237
[5]  
BRODY CJ, 1984, SOC FORCES, V63, P209
[6]   Gender differences in recreational use, environmental attitudes, and perceptions of future land use at the Savannah River Site [J].
Burger, J ;
Sanchez, J ;
Gibbons, JW ;
Gochfeld, M .
ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 1998, 30 (04) :472-486
[7]   Environmental attitudes and perceptions of future land use at the Savannah River Site: Are there racial differences? [J].
Burger, J .
JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A, 1998, 53 (04) :255-262
[8]   Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: Attitudes of hunters and fishermen [J].
Burger, J ;
Sanchez, J ;
Gibbons, JW ;
Gochfeld, M .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1997, 17 (03) :313-320
[9]  
Burger J, 1997, NEUROTOXICOLOGY, V18, P495
[10]  
BURGER J, 1999, INP RESS ENV MONITOR