Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context

被引:327
作者
Theeboom, Tim [1 ]
Beersma, Bianca [1 ]
van Vianen, Annelies E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Work & Org Psychol, NL-1018 XA Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
coaching; coaching effectiveness; coaching interventions; coaching outcomes; meta-analysis; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL-THERAPY; EFFECT SIZE; JOB-SATISFACTION; SELF-DETERMINATION; GOAL ATTAINMENT; PERFORMANCE; HEALTH; DEPRESSION; MOTIVATION; EMPLOYEES;
D O I
10.1080/17439760.2013.837499
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Whereas coaching is very popular as a management tool, research on coaching effectiveness is lagging behind. Moreover, the studies on coaching that are currently available have focused on a large variety of processes and outcome measures and generally lack a firm theoretical foundation. With the meta-analysis presented in this article, we aim to shed light on the effectiveness of coaching within an organizational context. We address the question whether coaching has an effect on five both theoretically and practically relevant individual-level outcome categories: performance/skills, well-being, coping, work attitudes, and goal-directed self-regulation. The results show that coaching has significant positive effects on all outcomes with effect sizes ranging from g=0.43 (coping) to g=0.74 (goal-directed self-regulation). These findings indicate that coaching is, overall, an effective intervention in organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 18
页数:18
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, INT COACHING PSYCHOL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, PAPER PRESENTED 8 AN
[3]  
[Anonymous], ORG RES METHODS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COACHING-INT J THEOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Combining Information: Statistical Issues and Opportunities for Research
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U SYDNEY SYDN
[7]  
[Anonymous], THESIS MACQUARIE U S
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2000, THESIS U TENNESSEE K
[9]  
[Anonymous], HARVARD BUSINESS REV
[10]  
[Anonymous], THESIS H ABEL SCH SO