A Trimodality Comparison of Volumetric Bone Imaging Technologies. Part III: SD, SEE, LSC Association With Fragility Fractures

被引:3
作者
Wong, Andy K. O. [1 ]
Beattie, Karen A. [1 ]
Min, Kevin K. H. [2 ]
Merali, Zamir [3 ]
Webber, Colin E. [4 ]
Gordon, Christopher L. [5 ]
Papaioannou, Alexandra [6 ]
Cheung, Angela M. W. [7 ]
Adachi, Jonathan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 1Y2, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON L8N 1Y2, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Dept Nucl Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Hamilton, ON L8N 1Y2, Canada
[6] Hamilton Hlth Sci, Div Geriatr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Osteoporosis Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Clinical sensitivity; fragility fractures; least significant change; pMRI; pQCT; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; TRABECULAR BONE; DISTAL RADIUS; DISCRIMINATES PATIENTS; MINERAL MEASUREMENTS; VERTEBRAL FRACTURE; WRIST FRACTURE; FEMORAL-NECK; ARCHITECTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2014.07.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Part II of this 3-part series demonstrated 1-yr precision, standard error of the estimate, and 1-yr least significant change for volumetric bone outcomes determined using peripheral (p) quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and peripheral magnetic resonance imaging (pMRI) modalities in vivo. However, no clinically relevant outcomes have been linked to these measures of change. This study examined 97 women with mean age of 75 +/- 9 yr and body mass index of 26.84 +/- 4.77 kg/m(2), demonstrating a lack of association between fragility fractures and standard deviation, least significant change and standard error of the estimate-based unit differences in volumetric bone outcomes derived from both pMRI and pQCT. Only cortical volumetric bone mineral density and cortical thickness derived from high-resolution pQCT images were associated with an increased odds for fractures. The same measures obtained by pQCT erred toward significance. Despite the smaller 1-yr and short-term precision error for measures at the tibia vs the radius, the associations with fractures observed at the radius were larger than at the tibia for high-resolution pQCT. Unit differences in cortical thickness and cortical volumetric bone mineral density able to yield a 50% increase in odds for fractures were quantified here and suggested as a reference for future power computations.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 418
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Assessment of bone mineral at appendicular sites in females with fractures of the proximal femur [J].
Augat, P ;
Fan, B ;
Lane, NE ;
Lang, TF ;
LeHir, P ;
Lu, Y ;
Uffmann, M ;
Genant, HK .
BONE, 1998, 22 (04) :395-402
[2]
Finite element analysis based on in vivo HR-pQCT images of the distal radius is associated with wrist fracture in postmenopausal women [J].
Boutroy, Stephanie ;
Van Rietbergen, Bert ;
Sornay-Rendu, Elisabeth ;
Munoz, Francoise ;
Bouxsein, Mary L. ;
Delmas, Pierre D. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2008, 23 (03) :392-399
[3]
Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: Preliminary in vivo MR imaging assessment in men with osteoporosis [J].
Boutry, N ;
Cortet, B ;
Dubois, P ;
Marchandise, X ;
Cotten, A .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (03) :708-717
[4]
Bone Microarchitecture in Hemodialysis Patients Assessed by HR-pQCT [J].
Cejka, Daniel ;
Patsch, Janina M. ;
Weber, Michael ;
Diarra, Danielle ;
Riegersperger, Markus ;
Kikic, Zeljko ;
Krestan, Christian ;
Schueller-Weidekamm, Claudia ;
Kainberger, Franz ;
Haas, Martin .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 6 (09) :2264-2271
[5]
Chang G, 2014, J BONE MINER METAB I
[6]
The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study [J].
Clowes, JA ;
Eastell, R ;
Peel, NFA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (12) :1794-1802
[7]
In vivo comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance image analysis of the distal radius in the assessment of osteoporosis [J].
Cortet, B ;
Boutry, N ;
Dubois, P ;
Bourel, P ;
Cotten, A ;
Marchandise, X .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (01) :15-26
[8]
Comparative assessment of bone mineral measurements using dual x-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography [J].
Formica, CA ;
Nieves, JW ;
Cosman, F ;
Garrett, P ;
Lindsay, R .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 8 (05) :460-467
[9]
Cut-off values determined for vertebral fracture by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in Japanese women [J].
Gorai, I ;
Nonaka, K ;
Kishimoto, H ;
Sakata, H ;
Fujii, Y ;
Fujita, T .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (09) :741-748
[10]
Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification [J].
Grampp, S ;
Genant, HK ;
Mathur, A ;
Lang, P ;
Jergas, M ;
Takada, M ;
Gluer, CC ;
Lu, Y ;
Chavez, M .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (05) :697-711