Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy

被引:117
作者
Hellberg, A
Rudberg, C [1 ]
Kullman, E
Enochsson, L
Fenyö, G
Graffner, H
Hallerbäck, B
Johansson, B
Anderberg, B
Wenner, J
Ringqvist, I
Sörensen, S
机构
[1] Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, S-72189 Vasteras, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Nacka Hosp, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Hosp Helsingborg, Dept Surg, Helsingborg, Denmark
[5] No Alvsborg Cty Hosp Trollhattan, Dept Surg, Trollhattan, Sweden
[6] Cent Hosp, Dept Res, Vasteras, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00971.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A prospective randomized multicentre study was performed to compare the outcome of laparoscopic and open appendicectomy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Methods: A total of 523 patients was randomized, but because of 23 withdrawals the outcome in 500 patients is reported, 244 in the laparoscopic group and 256 in the open group. Results: Patients having laparoscopic appendicectomy recovered more quickly than those having open surgery (13 versus 21 days, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in duration of sick leave after operation (laparoscopic group 11 days versus open group 14 days). Postoperative pain (at 24 h, 7 days and 14 days) was less after laparoscopic operations and a functional index 1 week after operation was more favourable in these patients (P < 0.001). Operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (60 versus 35 min, P < 0.01). Hospital stay and complications did not differ between the groups. Thirty laparoscopic procedures (12 per cent) were converted to open appendicectomy. Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is as safe as open appendicectomy and has the advantage of allowing a quicker recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 53
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   A PRACTICAL SCORE FOR THE EARLY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ALVARADO, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1986, 15 (05) :557-564
[2]  
ANDERSSON RE, 1992, EUR J SURG, V158, P37
[3]  
APELGREN KN, 1995, AM SURGEON, V61, P240
[4]  
ATTWOOD SEA, 1992, SURGERY, V112, P497
[5]  
BLIND PJ, 1986, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V152, P623
[6]   FATE OF NEGATIVE APPENDIX [J].
CHANG, FC ;
HOGLE, HH ;
WELLING, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1973, 126 (06) :752-754
[7]  
Chiarugi M, 1996, EUR J SURG, V162, P385
[8]   Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men [J].
Cox, MR ;
McCall, JL ;
Toouli, J ;
Padbury, RTA ;
Wilson, TG ;
Wattchow, DA ;
Langcake, M .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 20 (03) :263-266
[9]   THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE WITH LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
CUSCHIERI, A ;
DUBOIS, F ;
MOUIEL, J ;
MOURET, P ;
BECKER, H ;
BUESS, G ;
TREDE, M ;
TROIDL, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 161 (03) :385-387
[10]   COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE ABDOMINAL PAIN [J].
DEDOMBAL, FT ;
MCCANN, AP ;
LEAPER, DJ ;
STANILAND, JR ;
HORROCKS, JC .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1972, 2 (5804) :9-+