Features and classification methods to locate deciduous trees in images

被引:32
作者
Haering, N [1 ]
Lobo, ND [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Sch Comp Sci, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/cviu.1999.0769
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 [模式识别与智能系统]; 0812 [计算机科学与技术]; 0835 [软件工程]; 1405 [智能科学与技术];
摘要
We compare features and classification methods to locate deciduous trees in images. From this comparison we conclude that a back-propagation neural network achieves better classification results than the other classifiers we tested. Our analysis of the relevance of 51 features from seven feature extraction methods based on the graylevel co-occurrence matrix, Gabor filters, fractal dimension, steerable filters, the Fourier transform, entropy, and color shows that each feature contributes important information. We show how we obtain a 13-feature subset that significantly reduces the feature extraction time while retaining most of the complete feature set's power and robustness. The best subsets of features were found to be combinations of features of each of the extraction methods. Methods for classification and feature relevance determination that are based on the covariance or correlation matrix of the features (such as eigenanalyses or linear or quadratic classifiers) generally cannot be used, since even small sets of features are usually highly linearly redundant, rendering their covariance or correlation matrices too singular to be invertible. We argue that representing deciduous trees and many other objects by rich image descriptions can significantly aid their classification. We make no assumptions about the shape, location, viewpoint, viewing distance, lighting conditions, and camera parameters, and we only expect scanning methods and compression schemes to retain a "reasonable" image quality, (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 149
页数:17
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
ALTER TD, 1994, 1994 IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION, PROCEEDINGS, P892, DOI 10.1109/CVPR.1994.323920
[2]
AWAYA Y, 1992, P 17 C ISPRS WASH DC, P836
[3]
BELONGIE S, 1998, IEEE WORKSH CONT BAS
[4]
Bengio Yoshua, 1994, NEURAL NETWORKS
[5]
BOW ST, 1992, PATTERN RECOGNITION
[6]
CANNY JF, 1983, THESIS CAMBRIDGE
[7]
IMPROVED FRACTAL GEOMETRY BASED TEXTURE SEGMENTATION TECHNIQUE [J].
CHAUDHURI, BB ;
SARKAR, N ;
KUNDU, P .
IEE PROCEEDINGS-E COMPUTERS AND DIGITAL TECHNIQUES, 1993, 140 (05) :233-241
[8]
A THEORETICAL COMPARISON OF TEXTURE ALGORITHMS [J].
CONNERS, RW ;
HARLOW, CA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1980, 2 (03) :204-222
[9]
Cybenko G., 1989, Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, V2, P303, DOI 10.1007/BF02551274
[10]
FAHLMAN S, P 1998 CONN MOD SUMM