Noise levels of superconducting gravimeters at seismic frequencies

被引:91
作者
Banka, D [1 ]
Crossley, D
机构
[1] British Geol Survey, Kingsley Dunham Ctr, Nottingham NG12 5GG, England
[2] St Louis Univ, Dept Earth & Atmospher Sci, St Louis, MO 63103 USA
关键词
normal modes; seismic noise; superconducting gravimeter;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-246X.1999.00913.x
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Until recently superconducting gravimeters (SGs) have been used principally in tidal studies (periods 6-24 hr) due to their high sensitivity and low drift rates. This paper considers the performance of these instruments as long-period seismometers, particularly in the normal mode band (periods 1-54 min). To judge their suitability in providing useful information to seismology, it is important to determine their noise characteristics compared to other established instruments such as spring gravimeters. We compare several continuously recording instruments: the SGs in Esashi (Japan), Wuhan (China), Strasbourg (France) and Cantley (Canada) and the spring gravimeter ET-19 and seismometer STS-1 at the Black Forest Observatory (BFO, Germany). We also include non-permanent instruments, the SG102 at BFO as well as the ET-ls in Metsahovi (Finland). The five quietest days out of the available records are stacked to obtain the power spectral density of the noise in the frequency band 0.05-20 mHz (50 s to 6 hr). Our reference is the New Low Noise Model designed for seismometers. Only at the BFO site were there several instruments that could be compared; even so, in order to obtain the best individual data for each instrument the records selected were not simultaneous. The noise characteristics of the different instrument-site combinations are compared, leading to conclusions about site selection, instrument modifications and the recent potential of SGs to contribute to seismic normal mode studies. We refer to our previous work on the seismic noise magnitude, a summary statistic derived from the power spectral density which has been used to rank the performance of instrument-site combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Agnew D. C., 1986, EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, V67, P203, DOI 10.1029/EO067i016p00203
[2]  
[Anonymous], 93322 USGS
[3]  
ASCH G, 1988, BERLINER GEOWISSENSC, V15
[4]  
Banka D., 1997, THESIS GDMB INFORMAT
[5]  
BANKA D, 1998, P 13 INT S EARTH TID, P641
[6]  
Banka D., 1995, Bull. Inf. Mar. Terr., V122, P9148
[7]  
Beauduin R, 1996, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V86, P1760
[8]  
BOWER DR, 1991, CAHIERS CTR EUROPEAN, P129
[9]  
CROSSLEY D, 1993, B INF MAREES TERREST, V117, P8675
[10]  
CROSSLEY D, 1995, CAHIERS CTR EUROPEAN, P244