Ethical analysis in public health

被引:139
作者
Roberts, M
Reich, MR
机构
[1] Harvard Ctr Populat & Dev Studies, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08097-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Public-health regularly encounters serious ethical dilemmas, such as rationing scarce resources, influencing individuals to change their behaviour, and limiting freedom to diminish disease transmission. Yet unlike medical ethics, there is no agreed-upon framework for analysing these difficulties. We offer such a framework. It distinguishes three philosophical views, often invoked in public-health discourse: positions based on outcomes (utilitarianism), positions focused on rights and opportunities (liberalism), and views that emphasise character and virtue (communitarianism). We explore critical variations within each approach, and identify practical problems that arise In addressing the ethical dimensions of health policy. We conclude by examining challenges posed by the feminist argument of ethics-of-care and by postmodern views about the nature of ethics. Health professionals need enhanced skills in applied philosophy to improve the coherence, transparency, and quality of public deliberations over ethical Issues inherent in health policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1055 / 1059
页数:5
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
ALFORD W, 1995, STEAL BOOK ELEGANT O
[2]   Disability-adjusted life years: a critical review [J].
Anand, S ;
Hanson, K .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1997, 16 (06) :685-702
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, UTILITARIANISM, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511840852
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1982, LIBERALISM LIMITS JU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Development as Freedom
[6]  
[Anonymous], QUALITY LIFE
[7]  
BAIER A, 1994, MORAL PREJUDICES ESS, P21
[8]  
Beauchamp TL, 1994, Principles of biomedical ethics
[9]  
Bentham Jeremy, 1996, PRINCIPLES MORALS LE
[10]   Ethics instruction at schools of public health in the United States [J].
Coughlin, SS ;
Katz, WH ;
Mattison, DR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (05) :768-770