Putting mechanisms into crop production models

被引:165
作者
Boote, Kenneth J. [1 ]
Jones, James W. [2 ]
White, Jeffrey W. [3 ]
Asseng, Senthold [2 ]
Lizaso, Jon I. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Agron, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Arid Land Agr Res Ctr, Maricopa, AZ 85138 USA
[4] Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Prod Vegetal Fitotecnia, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
carbon dioxide; crop development; crop modeling; genotype by environment; leaf area growth; photosynthesis; process-based models; reproductive; temperature; transpiration; ATMOSPHERIC CO2 CONCENTRATION; CANOPY ASSIMILATION MODEL; RECOMBINANT INBRED LINES; LEAF NITROGEN ECONOMY; ELEVATED CO2; CARBON-DIOXIDE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; INDIVIDUAL LEAVES; SIMULATION-MODEL; WATER-DEFICIT;
D O I
10.1111/pce.12119
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Crop growth models dynamically simulate processes of C, N and water balance on daily or hourly time-steps to predict crop growth and development and at season-end, final yield. Their ability to integrate effects of genetics, environment and crop management have led to applications ranging from understanding gene function to predicting potential impacts of climate change. The history of crop models is reviewed briefly, and their level of mechanistic detail for assimilation and respiration, ranging from hourly leaf-to-canopy assimilation to daily radiation-use efficiency is discussed. Crop models have improved steadily over the past 30-40 years, but much work remains. Improvements are needed for the prediction of transpiration response to elevated CO2 and high temperature effects on phenology and reproductive fertility, and simulation of root growth and nutrient uptake under stressful edaphic conditions. Mechanistic improvements are needed to better connect crop growth to genetics and to soil fertility, soil waterlogging and pest damage. Because crop models integrate multiple processes and consider impacts of environment and management, they have excellent potential for linking research from genomics and allied disciplines to crop responses at the field scale, thus providing a valuable tool for deciphering genotype by environment by management effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1658 / 1672
页数:15
相关论文
共 189 条
[1]   A meta-analysis of elevated [CO2] effects on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, growth and yield [J].
Ainsworth, EA ;
Davey, PA ;
Bernacchi, CJ ;
Dermody, OC ;
Heaton, EA ;
Moore, DJ ;
Morgan, PB ;
Naidu, SL ;
Ra, HSY ;
Zhu, XG ;
Curtis, PS ;
Long, SP .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2002, 8 (08) :695-709
[2]   Evaluating the CROPGRO-soybean model ability to simulate photosynthesis response to carbon dioxide levels [J].
Alagarswamy, G ;
Boote, KJ ;
Allen, LH ;
Jones, JW .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (01) :34-42
[3]   Elevated CO2 increases water use efficiency by sustaining photosynthesis of water-limited maize and sorghum [J].
Allen, Leon Hartwell, Jr. ;
Kakani, Vijaya Gopal ;
Vu, Joseph C. V. ;
Boote, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 168 (16) :1909-1918
[4]   Efficiency of lignin biosynthesis: a quantitative analysis [J].
Amthor, JS .
ANNALS OF BOTANY, 2003, 91 (06) :673-695
[5]   Effects of atmospheric CO2 concentration on wheat yield:: review of results from experiments using various approaches to control CO2 concentration [J].
Amthor, JS .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2001, 73 (01) :1-34
[6]   Simulated wheat growth affected by rising temperature, increased water deficit and elevated atmospheric CO2 [J].
Asseng, S ;
Jamieson, PD ;
Kimball, B ;
Pinter, P ;
Sayre, K ;
Bowden, JW ;
Howden, SM .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2004, 85 (2-3) :85-102
[7]   Simulation of grain protein content with APSIM-Nwheat [J].
Asseng, S ;
Bar-Tal, A ;
Bowden, JW ;
Keating, BA ;
Van Herwaarden, A ;
Palta, JA ;
Huth, NI ;
Probert, ME .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2002, 16 (01) :25-42
[8]  
Asseng S., 1997, INT C MOD SIM HOB TA
[9]  
Asseng S., 2003, S CROP MOD GEN MINN
[10]   The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields [J].
Asseng, Senthold ;
Foster, Ian ;
Turner, Neil C. .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2011, 17 (02) :997-1012