A second-best evaluation of eight policy instruments to reduce carbon emissions

被引:61
作者
Parry, IWH
Williams, RC
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
carbon abatement policies; relative costs; pre-existing taxes; general equilibrium welfare effects;
D O I
10.1016/S0928-7655(99)00008-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper uses a numerical general equilibrium model to compare the costs of alternative policies for reducing carbon emissions in a second-best setting with a distortionary tax on labor. We examine a carbon tax, two energy taxes, and both narrow-based and broad-based emissions permits and performance standards. The presence of pre-existing tax distortions raises the costs of all these policies, and can affect their relative cost rankings. In fact, the superiority of emissions taxes and emissions permits over other instruments can hinge on whether these policies generate revenues that are used to reduce other distortionary taxes. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 373
页数:27
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
BALLARD CL, 1985, AM ECON REV, V75, P128
[2]  
Becker G. S., 1997, EFFICIENT TAXES EFFI
[3]  
BOVENBERG AL, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P1085
[4]  
Bovenberg AL, 1997, NATL TAX J, V50, P59
[5]  
BOVENBERG AL, 1998, IN PRESS HDB PUBLIC
[6]   ENERGY TAXATION AS A POLICY INSTRUMENT TO REDUCE CO2 EMISSIONS - A NET BENEFIT ANALYSIS [J].
BOYD, R ;
KRUTILLA, K ;
VISCUSI, WK .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 29 (01) :1-24
[7]   A neglected welfare cost of monopoly - and most other product market distortions [J].
Browning, EK .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1997, 66 (01) :127-144
[8]   THE NONTAX WEDGE [J].
BROWNING, EK .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1994, 53 (03) :419-433
[9]  
BROWNING EK, 1987, AM ECON REV, V77, P11
[10]  
CROPPER ML, 1992, J ECON LIT, V30, P675