Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: the plot thickens

被引:133
作者
Cutcliffe, JR
McKenna, HP
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Nursing, Rotherham S63 7ER, S Yorkshire, England
[2] RCN Inst, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Ulster, Sch Hlth Sci, Coleraine BT52 1SA, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
qualitative research; representativeness; establishing credibility; nursing research;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01090.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
qualitative research is increasingly recognized and valued and its unique place in nursing research is highlighted by many. Despite this, some nurse researchers continue to raise epistemological issues about the problems of objectivity and the validity of qualitative research findings. This paper explores the issues relating to the representativeness or credibility of qualitative research findings. It therefore critiques the existing distinct philosophical and methodological positions concerning the trustworthiness of qualitative research findings, which are described as follows: quantitative studies should be judged using the same criteria and terminology as quanitative studies; it is impossible, in a meaningful way, for any criteria to be used to judge qualitative studies; qualitative studies should be judged using criteria that are developed for and fit the qualitative paradigm; and the credibility of qualitative research findings could be established by testing out the emerging theory by means of conducting a deductive quantitative study. The authors conclude by providing some guidelines for establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 380
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Altheide D.L., 1994, Handbook of Qualitative Research, V2nd, P485
[2]   Validity in qualitative health care research: An exploration of the impact of individual researcher perspectives within collaborative enquiry [J].
Andrews, M ;
Lyne, P ;
Riley, E .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1996, 23 (03) :441-447
[3]   ANALYZING QUALITATIVE INTERVIEW DATA - ADDRESSING ISSUES OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY [J].
APPLETON, TV .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1995, 22 (05) :993-997
[5]   The variety of qualitative research .2. Non-positivist approaches [J].
Ashworth, PD .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 1997, 17 (03) :219-224
[6]   The variety of qualitative research .1. Introduction to the problem [J].
Ashworth, PD .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 1997, 17 (03) :215-218
[7]   Using triangulation in nursing research [J].
Begley, CM .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1996, 24 (01) :122-128
[8]  
Benner P. E., 1989, PRIMACY CARING STRES
[9]  
Benner PE., 1984, From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice
[10]  
BERGUM V, 1991, QUALITATIVE NURSING, P55