The relationship between self-talk and therapy process variables for novice therapists

被引:22
作者
NuttWilliams, E
Hill, CE
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
[2] Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-0167.43.2.170
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the affect and focus of therapists' self-talk in relation to other therapy process variables, specifically their perceptions of their own helpfulness and their clients' negative reactions, after taking into consideration the perceived strength of the working alliance. Participants included 31 therapists-in-training who listened to an audiotape of a therapy session while completing a thought listing procedure and process measures. Results indicated that self-talk was related to perceptions of the therapy process such that when therapists thought negatively about themselves, they perceived themselves as less helpful and thought their clients were reacting more negatively. The results suggest the importance of both the awareness and management of therapists' self-talk in relation to their perceptions of themselves and their clients.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 177
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
ADAMS JA, 1971, J MOTOR BEHAV, V3, P111
[2]  
[Anonymous], STANDARD EDITION COM
[3]   SELF-EVALUATIVE AND SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISMS GOVERNING THE MOTIVATIONAL EFFECTS OF GOAL SYSTEMS [J].
BANDURA, A ;
CERVONE, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 45 (05) :1017-1028
[4]  
BANDURA A, 1986, SOCIAL F THOUGHT ACT
[5]   DIMENSIONS OF THERAPIST RESPONSE AS CAUSAL FACTORS IN THERAPEUTIC CHANGE [J].
BARRETTLENNARD, GT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1962, 76 (43) :1-36
[6]  
Beck A., 1985, ANXIETY PHOBIAS COGN
[7]  
BECK A T, 1976, P356
[8]  
BECK AT, 1974, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V31, P319
[9]  
Borders L.D., 1988, COUNS EDUC SUPERV, V28, P59, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.1556-6978.1988.TB00788.X
[10]   DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIONS OF 1ST PRACTICUM SUPERVISEES [J].
BORDERS, LD .
JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 36 (02) :163-169