Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form

被引:42
作者
Jeffreys, M.
Warren, R.
Highnam, R.
Smith, G. Davey
机构
[1] Massey Univ, Ctr Publ Hlth Res, Wellington, New Zealand
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge, England
[3] Mirada Solut Ltd, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/24769358
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Limitations of area based measures of breast density have led several research groups to develop volumetric measures of breast density, for use in predicting risk and in epidemiological research. In this paper, we describe our initial experiences using an automated algorithm (standard mammogram form, SMF) to estimate the volume of the breast that is dense from digitized film mammograms. We performed analyses on 3816 mammograms of 626 women, who were part of the Glasgow Alumni Cohort and had mammograms taken within the Scottish Breast Screening Programme between 1989 and 2002. Absolute volume of dense breast tissue (SMF volume) and the percentage of the volume of the breast that is dense (SMF%) were calculated. The median (interquartile range) of SMF volume was 66 cm(3) (48 to 98), and of SMF% was 23.4% (18.6 to 29.7). SMF%, but not SMF volume, was positively related to a six category classification (SCC) of visually assigned area-based breast density (increase in ln(SMF%) per category increase in SCC: 0.04% (95%Cl: 0.03-0.05). The SMF algorithm produced lower SMF volume for craniocaudal (CC) compared with mediolateral oblique (MLO) views, but CC/MLO differences for SMF% were small. The mean right/left difference for ln(SMF volume) was -0.027 cm(3) (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.044 to -0.009) and of ln(SMF%) was 0.005% (95% Cl -0.008% to 0.019%). We present these initial data as a background for future analytical work using SMF.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 382
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[3]   The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Lockwood, GA ;
Byng, JW ;
Little, LE ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Tritchler, DL .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (09) :1233-1238
[4]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[5]   Symmetry of projection in the quantitative analysis of mammographic images [J].
Byng, JW ;
Boyd, NF ;
Little, L ;
Lockwood, G ;
Fishell, E ;
Jong, RA ;
Yaffe, MJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 1996, 5 (05) :319-327
[6]   Reproductive and hormonal factors associated with mammographic breast density by age (United States) [J].
El-Bastawissi, AY ;
White, E ;
Mandelson, MT ;
Taplin, SH .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2000, 11 (10) :955-963
[7]  
Gram IT, 1997, INT J CANCER, V73, P323, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971104)73:3<323::AID-IJC3>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-1
[9]  
Guo YP, 2001, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V10, P243
[10]   Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography part 1. Tissue and related risk factors [J].
Heine, JJ ;
Malhotra, P .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2002, 9 (03) :298-316