How 'green' are aquaculture, constructed wetlands and conventional wastewater treatment systems?

被引:28
作者
Brix, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aarhus, Dept Plant Ecol, DK-8240 Risskov, Denmark
关键词
aquaculture; ecological engineering; energy requirement; life-cycle assessment; living machine; recycling;
D O I
10.2166/wst.1999.0133
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The term 'green' is nowadays widely used (and misused) in connection with many types of technologies. If a technology is 'green' it usually means that the technology requires less non-renewable energy sources than other alternatives. However, other parameters need to be considered as well, such as sustainability, recycling potential, treatment capacity and potential, conservation of ecosystems, etc. In this paper the energy requirements and nutrient recycling potential of constructed wetlands and wastewater aquaculture facilities are compared with that of conventional wastewater treatment technologies. The energy requirements of constructed wetlands are very low, but if significant reuse of nutrients is included (aquaculture), the energy requirements increase significantly and usually beyond the energy equivalent of the biomass produced. This is especially true in cold temperate climates where the aquaculture systems need to be housed in heated greenhouses and artificial light must be provided to secure operation throughout the year. In countries where fresh water itself is a limiting resource and where the economic capability may limit the use of artificial fertilisers, the reuse potential of wastewater may be more important. The potential for sustainable cropping of the plant biomass is excellent in tropical wetlands as the plants have a high productivity and a continuous growing season. In order to evaluate in more detail the 'greenness' of the different wastewater treatment technologies, the life-cycle approach might be applied. However, because constructed wetlands, besides the water quality improvement function, perform a multitude of other functions such as biodiversity, habitat, climatic, hydrological and public use functions, methodologies need to be developed to evaluate these functions and to weigh them in relation to the water quality issues. (C) 1999 IAWQ Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 50
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? [J].
Brix, H .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (05) :11-17
[2]  
BRIX H, 1998, RECLAIMED WATER MANA, P97
[3]  
Ciupa R., 1996, P 5 INT C WETL SYST, P6
[4]   Implementation of constructed wetlands in developing countries [J].
Denny, P .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (05) :27-34
[5]   A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEFINITION OF RESOURCE EQUIVALENCY FACTORS FOR USE IN PRODUCT LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT [J].
GUINEE, JB ;
HEIJUNGS, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1995, 14 (05) :917-925
[6]  
GUTERSTAM B, 1997, ECOLOGICAL ENG WASTE, P89
[7]   Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: A comparison of six methods [J].
Hertwich, EG ;
Pease, WS ;
Koshland, CP .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 196 (01) :13-29
[8]   Wildlife habitat and public use benefits of treatment wetlands [J].
Knight, RL .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (05) :35-43
[9]   The sustainable process index - A new dimension in ecological evaluation [J].
Krotscheck, C ;
Narodoslawsky, M .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 6 (04) :241-258
[10]  
MIDDLEBROOKS EJ, 1981, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V53, P1172