A comparison of a needle-free injection system for local anesthesia versus EMLA® for intravenous catheter insertion in the pediatric patient

被引:50
作者
Jimenez, N [1 ]
Bradford, H [1 ]
Seidel, KD [1 ]
Sousa, M [1 ]
Lynn, AM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Childrens Hosp & Reg Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000194293.10549.62
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Placement of TV catheters is a painful and stressful procedure for children. J-Tip (R) is a needle-less Food and Drug Administration approved injection system that can be used for delivery of local anesthetic before IV cannulation. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of J-Tip (R) versus eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA (R)) to facilitate IV cannulation and provide adequate analgesia before IV placement. Children 7-19 years of age (n = 116) were randomized to receive 0.25 mL of 1% buffered lidocaine witli J-Tip (R) (n = 57) or 2.5 g of EMLA (R) (n = 59) before TV cannulation. Measurements of success of cannulation (number of attempts for IV placement) and pain (0-10 visual analog scale) at application of local anesthetic and at cannulation were performed. There was a significant (P = 0.0001) difference in pain ratings during IV cannulation between EMLA (R) (median = 3) and the J-Tip (R) (median = 0). Eighty-four percent of patients reported no pain at the time of J-Tip (R) lidocaine application compared to 61% in the EMLA (R) group at the time of dressing removal (P = 0.004). We did not find differences in the number of attempts for IV cannulation. J-Tip (R) application of 1% buffered lidocaine before IV cannulation is not painful and has better anesthetic effectiveness compared with EMLA (R).
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 414
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   VASCULAR-RESPONSE OF HUMAN-SKIN AFTER ANALGESIA WITH EMLA CREAM [J].
BJERRING, P ;
ANDERSEN, PH ;
ARENDTNIELSEN, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1989, 63 (06) :655-660
[2]   Topical amethocaine (Ametop™) is superior to EMLA for intravenous cannulation [J].
Browne, J ;
Awad, I ;
Plant, R ;
McAdoo, J ;
Shorten, G .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (11) :1014-1018
[3]   Evaluation of a needle-free injection system for local anaesthesia prior to venous cannulation [J].
Cooper, JA ;
Bromley, LM ;
Baranowski, AP ;
Barker, SGE .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (03) :247-250
[4]   Jet injector compared with oral midazolam for preoperative sedation in children [J].
Fine, B ;
Castillo, R ;
McDonald, T ;
Paisansathan, C ;
Zsigmond, E ;
Hoffman, WE .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 14 (09) :739-743
[5]   Lidocaine iontophoresis versus eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA®) for IV placement in children [J].
Galinkin, JL ;
Rose, JB ;
Harris, K ;
Watcha, MF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (06) :1484-1488
[6]  
Jennison C., 2000, GROUP SEQUENTIAL MET
[7]   Determinants of success and failure of EMLA [J].
Lander, J ;
Hodgins, M ;
Nazarali, S ;
McTavish, J ;
Ouellette, J ;
Friesen, E .
PAIN, 1996, 64 (01) :89-97
[8]   A needle-free jet-injection system with lidocaine for peripheral intravenous cannula insertion:: A randomized controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Lysakowski, C ;
Dumont, L ;
Tramèr, MR ;
Tassonyi, E .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 96 (01) :215-219