Rapid nongenomic effects of aldosterone on the renal vasculature in humans

被引:62
作者
Schmidt, BMW [1 ]
Sammer, U [1 ]
Fleischmann, I [1 ]
Schlaich, M [1 ]
Delles, C [1 ]
Schmieder, RE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Med Klin 4, Dept Nephrol & Hypertens, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
aldosterone; nitric oxide; glomerular filtration rate;
D O I
10.1161/01.HYP.0000205224.58715.cc
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
There is increasing evidence for the importance of rapid nongenomic effects of aldosterone on the human vasculature. In vitro animal experiments in renal arterioles also suggest the presence of such effects on the renal vasculature. We conducted a clinical study to explore these effects in vivo in humans. Thirteen healthy male volunteers were examined. Aldosterone ( 500 mu g) or placebo was injected intravenously with or without coinfusion of N( G) monomethyl-L-arginine ( L-NMMA) in a randomized, double-blinded 4-fold crossover design. Renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate were measured by constant infusion clearance technique using inulin and para-aminohippuric acid. Injection of aldosterone without concomitant infusion of L-NMMA changed the renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate not statistically significant compared with placebo. Coinfusion of L-NMMA unmasked the effect of aldosterone: aldosterone with L-NMMA decreased the glomerular filtration rate slightly ( - 1.4 +/- 6.2 mL/min), whereas infusion of L-NMMA alone increased the glomerular filtration rate ( 8.3 +/- 9.8 mL/min; P = 0.004). L-NMMA alone decreased renal plasma flow by 58.2 +/- 97.5 mL/min, and aldosterone with L-NMMA decreased renal plasma flow by 190.0 +/- 213.7 mL/min ( P = 0.074). Accordingly, Aldosterone with L-NMMA increased renal vascular resistance much more than L-NMMA alone ( 1588 +/- 237 versus 614 +/- 240 dyn x s x cm(-5); P = 0.014). These data indicate that aldosterone acts via rapid nongenomic effects in vivo in humans at the renal vasculature. Antagonizing the endothelial NO synthase unmasks these effects. Therefore, rapid nongenomic aldosterone effects increase renal vascular resistance and thereby mediate arterial hypertension if endothelial dysfunction is present.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 655
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Nongenomic vascular action of aldosterone in the glomerular microcirculation [J].
Arima, S ;
Kohagura, K ;
Xu, HL ;
Sugawara, A ;
Abe, T ;
Satoh, F ;
Takeuchi, K ;
Ito, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 (09) :2255-2263
[2]   Endothelium-derived nitric oxide modulates vascular action of aldosterone in renal arteriole [J].
Arima, S ;
Kohagura, K ;
Xu, HL ;
Sugawara, A ;
Uruno, A ;
Satoh, F ;
Takeuchi, K ;
Ito, S .
HYPERTENSION, 2004, 43 (02) :352-357
[3]   Direct comparison of the effects of valsartan and amlodipine on renal hemodynamics in human essential hypertension [J].
Delles, C ;
Klingbeil, AU ;
Schneider, MP ;
Handrock, R ;
Weidinger, G ;
Schmieder, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2003, 16 (12) :1030-1035
[4]   Assessment of endothelial function of the renal vasculature in human subjects [J].
Delles, C ;
Jacobi, J ;
Schlaich, MP ;
John, S ;
Schmieder, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2002, 15 (01) :3-9
[5]   Effects of enalapril and eprosartan on the renal vascular nitric oxide system in human essential hypertension [J].
Delles, C ;
Jacobi, J ;
John, S ;
Fleischmann, I ;
Schmieder, RE .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 61 (04) :1462-1468
[6]  
Falkenstein E, 2000, PHARMACOL REV, V52, P513
[7]   Non-genomic actions of aldosterone: role in hypertension [J].
Funder, JW .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2001, 10 (02) :227-230
[9]   Effect of familial hypertension on glomerular hemodynamics and tubulo-glomerular feedback after uninephrectomy [J].
Guidi, E ;
Cozzi, MG ;
Minetti, EE ;
Civati, G ;
Busnach, G ;
Brando, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 14 (02) :121-128
[10]   Effects of aldosterone on forearm vasculature in treated chronic heart failure [J].
Gunaruwan, P ;
Schmitt, M ;
Sharman, J ;
Lee, L ;
Struthers, A ;
Frenneaux, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (03) :412-414