Contrast-detail detectability analysis: Comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system

被引:39
作者
Liu, H
Fajardo, LL
Barrett, JR
Baxter, RA
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA
[2] Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Box 170, Charlottesville, VA 22908, Lee St
关键词
breast radiography; technology; digital mammography;
D O I
10.1016/S1076-6332(05)80291-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives. The authors compared the contrast-detail detectability properties of an optically coupled charge-coupled device (CCD) digital mammography system with those of a conventional analog screen-film mammography system. Methods. A proprietary contrast-detail phantom was imaged with both systems, Twelve observers viewed analog and digital images obtained at seven different mean glandular doses. Contrast-detail-dose curves were generated on the basis of the readers' visual perceptions. Interobserver errors were also calculated, In addition, the authors applied a theoretical model for lesion detectability to calculate and compare the digital and analog mammography systems, Results. The readers' contrast-detail detectability was significantly superior with the digital system in the detail and contrast ranges evaluated (P < .001). Conclusion. The performance of the readers paralleled the performance predicted by the theoretical model for the two imaging systems, The following features account for the superior performance of the digital mammography system: (a) higher quantum efficiency of the phosphor, (b) wider dynamic range, (c) better contrast transfer characteristics, and, most important, (ci) greater photon flux at the phosphor entrance.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 203
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
COHEN G, 1985, AAPM MED PHYSICS MON, V12, P141
[2]  
HASEGAWA BH, 1990, PHYSICAL MED XRAY IM
[3]   CHARGE-COUPLED DEVICE DETECTOR - PERFORMANCE CONSIDERATIONS AND POTENTIAL FOR SMALL-FIELD MAMMOGRAPHIC IMAGING APPLICATIONS [J].
KARELLAS, A ;
HARRIS, LJ ;
LIU, H ;
DAVIS, MA ;
DORSI, CJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (04) :1015-1023
[4]   ACCEPTANCE TESTING PRONE STEREOTAXIC BREAST BIOPSY UNITS [J].
KIMMESMITH, C ;
SOLBERG, T .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (07) :1197-1201
[5]   OBSERVER PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RADIOGRAPH SYSTEMS FOR STEREOTAXIC BREAST NEEDLE-BIOPSY [J].
KRUPINSKI, EA ;
ROEHRIG, H ;
YU, T .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1995, 2 (02) :116-122
[6]   Signal-to-noise ratio and detective quantum efficiency analysis of optically coupled CCD mammography imaging systems [J].
Liu, H ;
Fajardo, LL ;
Penny, BC .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1996, 3 (10) :799-805
[7]  
LIU H, 1995, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V2390, P110, DOI 10.1117/12.205991
[8]   METHODS TO CALCULATE THE LENS EFFICIENCY IN OPTICALLY COUPLED CCD X-RAY-IMAGING SYSTEMS [J].
LIU, H ;
KARELLAS, A ;
HARRIS, LJ ;
DORSI, CJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (07) :1193-1195
[9]  
LIU H, 1993, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V1894, P136, DOI 10.1117/12.154943
[10]   LESION DETECTABILITY CONSIDERATIONS FOR AN OPTICALLY-COUPLED CCD X-RAY-IMAGING SYSTEM [J].
LIU, H ;
KARELLAS, A ;
MOORE, SC ;
HARRIS, LJ ;
DORSI, CJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1994, 41 (04) :1506-1509