Optimal bidding and contracting strategies for capital-intensive goods

被引:178
作者
Wu, DJ
Kleindorfer, PR
Zhang, JE
机构
[1] Drexel Univ, Bennett S LeBow Coll Business, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Econ & Finance, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Finance, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
bidding; contracting; capital-intensive goods; investment; modeling;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00093-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper models contracting arrangements between one Seller and one or more Buyers when the "deliverable" or output under the contract is produced in a non-scalable capital-intensive production facility. The basic model proposed allows the Seller and Buyers to negotiate bilateral contracts for the good in advance. On the day, the Seller and Buyers can also sell excess capacity or buy additional non-contract output in an associated backup market, which is being referred to as the spot market for the good. The type of bilateral contract studied has a two-part contract fee structure, and it is at the foundation of practical contracts used by many capital-intensive industries, where capacity can only be expanded well in advance of output requirements. The first part is a reservation cost per unit of capacity, and the second, an execution cost per unit of output when this capacity is actually used. This paper derives the Seller's optimal bidding and Buyers' optimal contracting strategies in a von Stackelberg game with the Seller as the leader. We show that Buyers' optimal reservation level follows an index that combines the Seller's reservation and execution cost. The Seller's optimal strategy is to reveal its variable cost of producing output while extracting its margin from the Buyers using the capacity reservation charge. This structure allows for the Seller to assure in advance its ability to pay the capital costs of capacity while providing Buyers appropriate incentives to take advantage of better terms on the day if alternative, cheaper sources should arise after contracts have been set. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 676
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Anupindi R., 1999, QUANTITATIVE MODELS, P197
[2]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[3]  
BOWER J, 1999, MODEL BASED COMP POO
[4]  
BUCKLEY P, 1996, FIRMS ORG CONTRACTS
[5]   Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Lariviere, MA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1999, 45 (08) :1091-1108
[6]  
Chao H., 1998, Designing Competitive Electricity Markets, V1st
[7]  
Corbett C. J., 1999, Quantitative models for supply chain management, P269
[8]  
Dixit K., 1994, INVESTMENT UNCERTAIN
[9]   OPEN ACCESS AND THE EVOLUTION OF THE UNITED-STATES SPOT MARKET FOR NATURAL-GAS [J].
DOANE, MJ ;
SPULBER, DF .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1994, 37 (02) :477-517
[10]  
Fernando C.S., 1997, VIRTUAL UTILITY