The Effects of Different Types of Automated Inclining Bed and Tilt Angle on Body-Pressure Redistribution

被引:6
作者
Yi, Chung-hwi [1 ]
Kim, Han-sung [2 ]
Yoo, Won-gyu [3 ]
Kim, Min-hee [4 ]
Kwon, Oh-yun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Res Inst Med Instruments & Rehabil Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Seoul 120749, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Biomed Sci & Engn, Dept Phys Therapy, Gyeongnam, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Rehabil Therapy, Seoul 120749, South Korea
关键词
ULCER RISK; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; SORE PREVENTION; BRADEN; REDUCE; SCALES;
D O I
10.1097/01.ASW.0000305473.37745.9b
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100227 [皮肤病学];
摘要
The damage caused by pressure in bedridden hospitalized patients is attributable to the body tissues becoming compressed against bony prominences, which results in poor capillary perfusion. Automated inclining beds were developed in this study to assist patients in repositioning, with the aim of quantifying the effects of 3 types of bed (bed 1, 1-axis tilting; bed 2, 1-axis and 2-segment tilting; and bed 3, 2-axis and 3-segment tilting) and 3 tilt angles (10, 15, and 20 degrees upward from the horizontal) on body-pressure redistribution. Twenty healthy subjects (14 men and 6 women) aged 21 to 26 years were recruited from the Yonsei University student population (mean [SD]: height, 164.0 cm [5.5 cm]; weight, 58.7 kg [7.3 kg]). A body-pressure measurement system was used to analyze the pressure distributions of the human body for the different bed types and tilt angles. The results showed that pressure reduction was significantly greater for bed 2 than for beds 1 and 3, and for tilt angles of 15 and 20 degrees upward. The highest pressure reduction was found for bed 2, with a tilt angle of 20 degrees upward from the horizontal. ADV SKIN WOUND CARE 2009; 22: 259-64
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
Allman R M, 1999, Adv Wound Care, V12, P22
[2]
Predicting pressure ulcer risk - A multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale [J].
Bergstrom, N ;
Braden, B ;
Kemp, M ;
Champagne, M ;
Ruby, E .
NURSING RESEARCH, 1998, 47 (05) :261-269
[3]
Bliss M R, 1998, J Tissue Viability, V8, P4
[4]
Economic assessment of pressure sore prevention using a computerized mattress system in patients with spinal cord injury [J].
Catz, A ;
Zifroni, A ;
Philo, O .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 27 (21) :1315-1319
[5]
Feasibility study of a novel approach to sore prevention in patients with spinal cord lesions: the computerized dynamic control Matrix 200 system [J].
Catz, A ;
Philo, O ;
Gilad, N ;
Barel, O ;
Geva, T .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1999, 13 (01) :44-47
[6]
Recovery of neurologic function after spinal cord injury in Israel [J].
Catz, A ;
Thaleisnik, M ;
Fishel, B ;
Ronen, J ;
Spasser, R ;
Folman, Y ;
Shabtai, EL ;
Gepstein, R .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (16) :1733-1735
[7]
Clark M, 1997, J WOUND CARE, V44, P1435
[8]
Influence of external pressure on transcutaneous oxygen tension and laser Doppler flowmetry on sacral skin [J].
Colin, D ;
Saumet, JL .
CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 16 (01) :61-72
[9]
The effects of medial and lateral displacement calcaneal osteotomies on ankle and subtalar joint pressure distribution [J].
Davitt, JS ;
Beals, TC ;
Bachus, KN .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 22 (11) :885-889
[10]
Do pressure relief cushions really relieve pressure? [J].
Defloor, T ;
Grypdonck, MHF .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2000, 22 (03) :335-350