Preemptive transplantation for patients with diabetes-related kidney disease

被引:62
作者
Becker, BN
Rush, SH
Dykstra, DM
Becker, YT
Port, FK
机构
[1] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI 48103 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Med, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.166.1.44
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Preemptive kidney transplantation (PreKT) before initiation of chronic dialysis has been examined recently with favorable results as the most effective treatment for kidney failure. Given that few of these studies are disease specific, the present analyses investigated the outcomes of PreKT by transplantation option and diabetes type. Methods: The impact of PreKT on posttransplantation mortality and graft failure was examined in 23 238 adults with type I and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), receiving either living or deceased donor kidneys or undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2002. Results: The PreKTs were provided to 14.4% of patients with type 1 DM and 6.7% of patients with type 2 DM. Cox regression models were used to estimate the effect of PreKT on the adjusted risk ratio (RR) of graft failure and mortality. After adjusting for multiple factors, PreKT in this era was associated with lower RR of mortality only among type 1 and type 2 diabetic recipients of transplants from living donors and SPK transplant recipients with type 1 DM (RR, 0.50-0.65 P <.007 for each). The effect on graft failure was less pronounced, significant only for preemptive SPK transplant recipients (RR, 0.79; P=.01 vs nonpreemptive SPK transplant recipients). Conclusions: These analyses suggest that PreKT has significant benefits for subsets of patients with types 1 and 2 DM and end-stage renal disease. It also suggests a time trend toward less benefit from preemptive transplants from deceased donors in more recent years compared with the early 1990s. This observation and the discrepancies between RR of graft loss and RR of mortality deserve further study.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 48
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Am J Kidney Dis, V42, P1
[2]  
Becker BN, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P2517, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V12112517
[3]  
BENHAMOU PY, 1992, CLIN NEPHROL, V38, P239
[4]   Latin American consensus on diabetes mellitus and hypertension [J].
Burlando, G ;
Sánchez, RA ;
Ramos, FH ;
Mogensen, CE ;
Zanchetti, A .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 22 (12) :2229-2241
[5]   Serum C-peptide concentrations poorly phenotype type 2 diabetic end-stage renal disease patients [J].
Covic, AMC ;
Schelling, JR ;
Constantiner, M ;
Iyengar, SK ;
Sedor, JR .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (04) :1742-1750
[6]  
Goldberg Ronald B., 2003, Cardiology Clinics, V21, P399, DOI 10.1016/S0733-8651(03)00074-2
[7]   Mortality assessment for pancreas transplants [J].
Gruessner, RWG ;
Sutherland, DER ;
Gruessner, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 (12) :2018-2026
[8]   The impact of residual renal function on graft and patient survival rates in recipients of preemptive renal transplants [J].
Ishani, A ;
Ibrahim, HN ;
Gilbertson, D ;
Collins, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2003, 42 (06) :1275-1282
[9]   Overview of large database analysis in renal transplantation [J].
Kaplan, B ;
Schold, J ;
Meier-Kriesche, HU .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 3 (09) :1052-1056
[10]   Preemptive kidney transplantation: The advantage and the advantaged [J].
Kasiske, BL ;
Snyder, JJ ;
Matas, AJ ;
Ellison, MD ;
Gill, JS ;
Kausz, AT .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (05) :1358-1364