Justifying precautionary policies: Incommensurability and uncertainty

被引:13
作者
Aldred, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Emmanuel Coll, Cambridge CB2 3AP, England
关键词
Precautionary principle; Incommensurability; Keynesian uncertainty; Decision theory; Rawls; MAXMIN EXPECTED UTILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DECISION-MAKING; ECONOMICS; AMBIGUITY; PRINCIPLE; WEIGHT; CHOICE; IRREVERSIBILITY; ETHICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.10.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
When decisions are taken in conditions of Keynesian or Knightian uncertainty, and when there is a threat of serious or irreversible environmental damage, the Precautionary Principle is often recommended to guide decision-making. However, the Precautionary Principle has been widely criticised. In response to these criticisms, a qualitative version of the Precautionary Principle is developed which draws its normative content from a blend of formal decision theory and political philosophy. It is argued that precautionary action can be justified by some flexible combination of uncertainty and incommensurability. The 'greater' the uncertainty, the 'less' incommensurability is required to justify precautionary action, and vice versa. Throughout the paper, the arguments are explored using the example of climate change decision problems. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 140
页数:9
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Ackerman F., 2009, CAN WE AFFORD FUTURE
[2]  
Al-Najjar NI, 2009, ECON PHILOS, V25, P249, DOI 10.1017/S026626710999023X
[3]   Incommensurability and monetary valuation [J].
Aldred, Jonathan .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2006, 82 (02) :141-161
[4]   Climate change uncertainty, irreversibility and the precautionary principle [J].
Aldred, Jonathan .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2012, 36 (05) :1051-1072
[5]   Ethics and Climate Change Cost-Benefit Analysis: Stern and After [J].
Aldred, Jonathan .
NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2009, 14 (04) :469-488
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Rationality and freedom
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1931, The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays
[8]   Fact-free learning [J].
Aragones, E ;
Gilboa, I ;
Postlewaite, A ;
Schmeidler, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (05) :1355-1368
[9]  
Arrow K., 1972, UNCERTAINTY EXPECTAT, P1
[10]   Objective or Multi-Objective? Two Historically Competing Visions for Benefit-Cost Analysis [J].
Banzhaf, H. Spencer .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2009, 85 (01) :3-23