Handwashing with soap or alcoholic solutions?: A randomized clinical trial of its effectiveness

被引:99
作者
Zaragoza, M [1 ]
Sallés, M [1 ]
Gomez, J [1 ]
Bayas, JM [1 ]
Trilla, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Hyg & Cent Sterilizat Serv, Hosp Clin, Microbiol Lab,Prevent Med Dept, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1053/ic.1999.v27.a97622
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The effectiveness of an alcoholic solution compared with the standard hygienic handwashing procedure during regular work in clinical wards and intensive care units of a large public university hospital in Barcelona was assessed. Methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial with crossover design, paired data, and blind evaluation was done. Eligible health care workers (HCWs) included permanent and temporary HCWs of wards and intensive care units. From each category, a random sample of persons was selected. HCWs were randomly assigned to regular handwashing (liquid soap and water) or handwashing with the alcoholic solution by using a crossover design. The number of colony-forming units on agar plates from hands printing in 3 different samples was counted. Results: A total of 47 HCWs were included. The average reduction in the number of colony-forming units from samples before handwashing to samples after handwashing was 49.6% for soap and water and 88.2% for the alcoholic solution. When both methods were compared, the average number of colony-forming units recovered after the procedure showed a statistically significant difference in favor of the alcoholic solution (P <.001). The alcoholic solution was well tolerated by HCWs. Overall acceptance rate was classified as "good" by 72% of HCWs after 2 weeks use. Of all HCWs included, 9.3% stated that the use of the alcoholic solution worsened minor pre-existing skin conditions. Conclusions: Although the regular use of hygienic soap and water handwashing procedures is the gold standard, the use of alcoholic solutions is effective and safe and deserves more attention, especially in situations in which the handwashing compliance rate is hampered by architectural problems (lack of sinks) or nursing work overload.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 261
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF ALTERNATIVE HAND-WASHING AGENTS IN REDUCING NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS [J].
DOEBBELING, BN ;
STANLEY, GL ;
SHEETZ, CT ;
PFALLER, MA ;
HOUSTON, AK ;
ANNIS, L ;
LI, N ;
WENZEL, RP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (02) :88-93
[2]   BLAND SOAP HANDWASH OR HAND ANTISEPSIS - THE PRESSING NEED FOR CLARITY [J].
EHRENKRANZ, NJ .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 13 (05) :299-301
[3]  
Freeman J, 1993, P 33 INT C ANT AG CH
[4]   HAND-WASHING AND NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS [J].
GOLDMANN, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (02) :120-122
[5]   FREQUENCY AND DURATION OF HANDWASHING IN AN INTENSIVE-CARE UNIT [J].
GRAHAM, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1990, 18 (02) :77-80
[6]   HANDWASHING - THE SEMMELWEIS LESSON FORGOTTEN [J].
JARVIS, WR .
LANCET, 1994, 344 (8933) :1311-1312
[7]   A multifaceted approach to changing handwashing behavior [J].
Larson, EL ;
Bryan, JL ;
Adler, LM ;
Blane, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1997, 25 (01) :3-10
[8]   APIC GUIDELINE FOR HANDWASH HAND ANTISEPSIS IN HEALTH-CARE SETTINGS [J].
LARSON, EL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1995, 23 (04) :251-269
[9]  
Murray PR., 1995, MANUAL CLIN MICROBIO
[10]  
TRILLA A, 1994, LANCET, V345, P123