Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths

被引:803
作者
Luthans, F [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
来源
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE | 2002年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.5465/AME.2002.6640181
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This article proposes a positive approach to organizational behavior (OB). Although the importance of positive feelings has been recognized through the years in the academic OB and popular literature, both management scholars and practitioners have arguably too often taken a negative perspective-trying to fix what is wrong with managers and employees and concentrating on weaknesses. Positive organizational behavior (POB) follows the lead of recently emerging positive psychology, which is driven by theory and research focusing on people's strengths and psychological capabilities. Instead of just retreading and putting a positive spin on traditional OB concepts, this unveiling of POB sets forth specific criteria for inclusion. Not only does positivity have to be associated with the concept, but it must also be relatively unique to the OB field, have valid measures, be adaptable to leader/management and human resource training and development, and, most important, capable of contributing to performance improvement in today's workplace. The criteria-meeting concepts of confidence/self-efficacy, hope, optimism, subjective well-being/happiness, and emotional intelligence (or the acronym CHOSE) are identified and analyzed as most representative of the proposed POB approach. The implications of these POB concepts for the workplace are given particular attention.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 72
页数:16
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Abraham R, 1999, GENET SOC GEN PSYCH, V125, P209
[2]  
ADAMS, IN PRESS WORKPLACE S
[3]   ON THE ARBITRARY DISTINCTION BETWEEN STATES AND TRAITS [J].
ALLEN, BP ;
POTKAY, CR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 41 (05) :916-928
[4]   JUST AS ARBITRARY AS EVER - REJOINDER [J].
ALLEN, BP ;
POTKAY, CR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (05) :1087-1089
[5]  
Ashkanasy N.M., 2000, EMOTIONS WORKPLACE R
[6]   SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) :122-147
[7]  
BANDURA A, 1997, SELF EFFICACY EXERCI, P42
[8]  
Bandura A., 2009, Handbook of Principles of Organization Behavior, P179, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781119206422.CH10, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206422.ch10]
[9]   Emotional expression and implications for occupational stress;: an application of the Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i) [J].
Bar-On, R ;
Brown, JM ;
Kirkcaldy, BD ;
Thomé, EP .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2000, 28 (06) :1107-1118
[10]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26