Bond Breaking and Bond Formation: How Electron Correlation is Captured in Many-Body Perturbation Theory and Density-Functional Theory

被引:84
作者
Caruso, Fabio [1 ]
Rohr, Daniel R. [1 ,2 ]
Hellgren, Maria [3 ]
Ren, Xinguo [1 ]
Rinke, Patrick [1 ]
Rubio, Angel [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Scheffler, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Fritz Haber Inst Max Planck Gesell, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Rice Univ, Dept Chem, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[3] Int Sch Adv Studies SISSA, I-34136 Trieste, Italy
[4] Univ Basque Country, CFM CSIC UPV EHU MPC & DIPC, Nanobio Spect Grp, E-20018 Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[5] Univ Basque Country, CFM CSIC UPV EHU MPC & DIPC, ETSF Sci Dev Ctr, E-20018 Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
RANDOM-PHASE-APPROXIMATION; CORRELATION ENERGY; STATIC CORRELATION; GROUND-STATE; KOHN-SHAM; GAS; CHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.146403
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
For the paradigmatic case of H-2 dissociation, we compare state-of-the-art many-body perturbation theory in the GW approximation and density-functional theory in the exact-exchange plus random-phase approximation (RPA) for the correlation energy. For an unbiased comparison and to prevent spurious starting point effects, both approaches are iterated to full self-consistency (i.e., sc-RPA and sc-GW). The exchange-correlation diagrams in both approaches are topologically identical, but in sc-RPA they are evaluated with noninteracting and in sc-GW with interacting Green functions. This has a profound consequence for the dissociation region, where sc-RPA is superior to sc-GW. We argue that for a given diagrammatic expansion, sc-RPA outperforms sc-GW when it comes to bond breaking. We attribute this to the difference in the correlation energy rather than the treatment of the kinetic energy. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.146403
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, QUANTUM THEORY MANY
[2]   The GW method [J].
Aryasetiawan, F ;
Gunnarsson, O .
REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 1998, 61 (03) :237-312
[3]   Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry [J].
Bartlett, Rodney J. ;
Musial, Monika .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2007, 79 (01) :291-352
[4]   CONSERVATION LAWS AND CORRELATION FUNCTIONS [J].
BAYM, G ;
KADANOFF, LP .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1961, 124 (02) :287-+
[5]   SELF-CONSISTENT APPROXIMATIONS IN MANY-BODY SYSTEMS [J].
BAYM, G .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1962, 127 (04) :1391-&
[6]   Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals [J].
Blum, Volker ;
Gehrke, Ralf ;
Hanke, Felix ;
Havu, Paula ;
Havu, Ville ;
Ren, Xinguo ;
Reuter, Karsten ;
Scheffler, Matthias .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, 180 (11) :2175-2196
[7]   A COLLECTIVE DESCRIPTION OF ELECTRON INTERACTIONS .3. COULOMB INTERACTIONS IN A DEGENERATE ELECTRON GAS [J].
BOHM, D ;
PINES, D .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1953, 92 (03) :609-625
[8]   Unified description of ground and excited states of finite systems: The self-consistent GW approach [J].
Caruso, F. ;
Rinke, P. ;
Ren, X. ;
Scheffler, M. ;
Rubio, A. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2012, 86 (08)
[9]   GENERALIZATION OF THE OPTIMIZED-EFFECTIVE-POTENTIAL MODEL TO INCLUDE ELECTRON CORRELATION - A VARIATIONAL DERIVATION OF THE SHAM-SCHLUTER EQUATION FOR THE EXACT EXCHANGE-CORRELATION POTENTIAL [J].
CASIDA, ME .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1995, 51 (03) :2005-2013
[10]   Self-consistent solution of the Dyson equation for atoms and molecules within a conserving approximation [J].
Dahlen, NE ;
van Leeuwen, R .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 122 (16)