Heuristics for joint decisions in production, transportation, and order quantity

被引:12
作者
Yung, KL [1 ]
Tang, JF
Ip, AWH
Wang, DW
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] NE Univ, Dept Syst Engn, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Northeastern Univ, Dept Syst Engn, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
supply chain management; production/distribution coordination; Lagrange relaxation; decomposition;
D O I
10.1287/trsc.1040.0111
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
An attempt is made to tackle joint decisions in assigning production, lot size, transportation, and order quantity for single and multiple products in a production-distribution network system with multiple suppliers and multiple destinations. The approach hinges on providing an optimized solution to the joint decision model GDM) through a two-layer decomposition (TLD) method that combines several heuristics. By combining the Lagrange multipliers and introducing a number of artificial variables into the two-layer decomposition, a Lagrange relaxation decomposition (LRD) method with heuristics is developed to solve multiproduct joint decision problems (JDM-M). Using the LRD, the JDM-M model is solved by decomposing into two sub-problems in two layers. The first layer is the joint decisions in assigning production, transportation flow, and lot size (APLS-TF) using the assignment heuristic AH-M. The second layer is the joint decisions in transportation and order quantity (TOQ-M) using a revised BH heuristic. Combined with Lagrange multipliers, the APLS-TF model takes into consideration the transportation costs together with production costs when it assigns annual production among suppliers. In essence, the algorithm assigns annual production simultaneously with annual transportation flows. Simulations on different sizes of problems and problems with large variances in data have shown that the LRD is effective, and in general more effective than the TLD.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 116
页数:18
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   AN ANALYSIS OF INVENTORY AND TRANSPORTATION COSTS IN A CONSTRAINED NETWORK [J].
BENJAMIN, J .
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 1989, 23 (03) :177-183
[2]  
Bertazzi L, 1999, LECT NOTES ECON MATH, V480, P137
[3]   ANALYZING TRADE-OFFS BETWEEN TRANSPORTATION, INVENTORY AND PRODUCTION COSTS ON FREIGHT NETWORKS [J].
BLUMENFELD, DE ;
BURNS, LD ;
DILTZ, JD ;
DAGANZO, CF .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1985, 19 (05) :361-380
[4]   SYNCHRONIZING PRODUCTION AND TRANSPORTATION SCHEDULES [J].
BLUMENFELD, DE ;
BURNS, LD ;
DAGANZO, CF .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1991, 25 (01) :23-37
[5]   DETERMINING PROFIT-MAXIMIZING PRODUCTION SHIPPING POLICIES IN A ONE-TO-ONE DIRECT SHIPPING, STOCHASTIC DEMAND ENVIRONMENT [J].
CHIEN, TW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1993, 64 (01) :83-102
[6]   STRATEGIC ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED PRODUCTION-DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS - MODELS AND METHODS [J].
COHEN, MA ;
LEE, HL .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1988, 36 (02) :216-228
[7]   Integrating distribution, machine assignment and lot-sizing via Lagrangean relaxation [J].
Fumero, F ;
Vercellis, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1997, 49 (01) :45-54
[8]   Synchronized development of production, inventory, and distribution schedules [J].
Fumero, F ;
Vercellis, C .
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 1999, 33 (03) :330-340
[9]   INTEGRATED PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, AND INVENTORY PLANNING SYSTEM [J].
GLOVER, F ;
JONES, G ;
KARNEY, D ;
KLINGMAN, D ;
MOTE, J .
INTERFACES, 1979, 9 (05) :21-35
[10]   THE ECONOMIC LOT AND DELIVERY SCHEDULING PROBLEM - THE SINGLE ITEM CASE [J].
HAHM, J ;
YANO, CA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1992, 28 (02) :235-252