Entry liberalization and inequality in industrial performance

被引:36
作者
Aghion, P
Burgess, R
Redding, S
Zilibotti, F
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, London, England
[2] Inst Int Econ Studies, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.291
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Industrial delicensing, which began in 1985 in India marked a discrete break from a past of centrally planned industrial development. Similar liberalization episodes are taking place across the globe. We develop a simple Schumpeterian growth model to understand how firms respond to the entry threat imposed by liberalization. The model emphasizes that firm responses, even within the same industrial sector, are likely to be heterogeneous leading to an increase in within industry inequality. Technologically advanced firms and those located in regions with pro-business institutions are more likely to respond to the threat of entry by investing in new technologies and production processes. Empirical analysis using a panel of three-digit state-industry data from India for the period 1980-1997 confirms that delicensing led to an increase in within industry inequality in industrial performance.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 302
页数:12
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
ACEMOGLU D, 2005, IN PRESS J EUROPEAN
[2]  
AGHION P, 2004, INNOVATE ESCAPE ENTR
[3]  
AGHION P, 2004, UNEQUAL EFFECTS LIBE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, HDB INT TRADE
[5]   Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India [J].
Besley, T ;
Burgess, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :91-134
[6]   Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: Evidence from Chilean plants [J].
Pavcnik, N .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2002, 69 (01) :245-276
[7]  
RODRIK D, 2004, NBER WORKING PAPER
[8]   Distance to the efficiency frontier and foreign direct investment spillovers [J].
Sabirianova, K ;
Svejnar, J ;
Terrell, K .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2005, 3 (2-3) :576-586
[9]  
Topalova P., 2004, TRADE LIBERALIZATION