Reforming options for hydrogen production from fossil fuels for PEM fuel cells

被引:95
作者
Ersoz, A
Olgun, H
Ozdogan, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Marmara Univ, Fac Engn, TR-81040 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] TUBITAK Marmara Res Ctr, Inst Energy, TR-41470 Kocaeli, Turkey
关键词
fuel reforming; PEM fuel cell; hydrogen production;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.02.092
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
PEM fuel cell systems are considered as a sustainable option for the future transport sector in the future. There is great interest in converting current hydrocarbon based transportation fuels into hydrogen rich gases acceptable by PEM fuel cells on-board of vehicles. In this paper, we compare the results of our simulation studies for 100 kW PEM fuel cell systems utilizing three different major reforming technologies, namely steam reforming (SREF), partial oxidation (POX) and autothermal reforming (ATR). Natural gas, gasoline and diesel are the selected hydrocarbon fuels. It is desired to investigate the effect of the selected fuel reforming options on the overall fuel cell system efficiency, which depends on the fuel processing, PEM fuel cell and auxiliary system efficiencies. The Aspen-HYSYS 3.1 code has been used for simulation purposes. Process parameters of fuel preparation steps have been determined considering the limitations set by the catalysts and hydrocarbons involved. Results indicate that fuel properties, fuel processing system and its operation parameters, and PEM fuel cell characteristics all affect the overall system efficiencies. Steam reforming appears as the most efficient fuel preparation option for all investigated fuels. Natural gas with steam reforming shows the highest fuel cell system efficiency. Good heat integration within the fuel cell system is absolutely necessary to achieve acceptable overall system efficiencies. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 73
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FUEL CELLS DISTR GEN
[2]   The multiple roles for catalysis in the production of H2 [J].
Armor, JN .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 1999, 176 (02) :159-176
[3]   Catalytic autothermal reforming of methane and propane over supported metal catalysts [J].
Ayabe, S ;
Omoto, H ;
Utaka, T ;
Kikuchi, R ;
Sasaki, K ;
Teraoka, Y ;
Eguchi, K .
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL, 2003, 241 (1-2) :261-269
[4]  
BERLOWITZ PJ, 2000010003 SAE
[5]   Fuel cell commercialization issues for light-duty vehicle applications [J].
BorroniBird, CE .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 1996, 61 (1-2) :33-48
[6]  
Brown LF, 2001, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V26, P381, DOI 10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00092-6
[7]  
CHINTAWAR PS, 1999, P TECHN PROGR 16 M N, P109
[8]   Catalytic aspects of the steam reforming of hydrocarbons in internal reforming fuel cells [J].
Clarke, SH ;
Dicks, AL ;
Pointon, K ;
Smith, TA ;
Swann, A .
CATALYSIS TODAY, 1997, 38 (04) :411-423
[9]  
DAVID P, 2000, 2000 ANN PROGR REP F
[10]   Advances in catalysts for internal reforming in high temperature fuel cells [J].
Dicks, AL .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 1998, 71 (1-2) :111-122