Decisions about prenatal testing for chromosomal disorders: Perceptions of a diverse group of pregnant women

被引:43
作者
Moyer, A
Brown, B
Gates, E
Daniels, M
Brown, HD
Kuppermann, M
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Program Hlth Psychol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE | 1999年 / 8卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/jwh.1.1999.8.521
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We conducted a study to elucidate factors influencing women's decisions regarding prenatal genetic screening for and diagnosis of chromosomal disorders and to learn about their experiences with these tests and with the medical system. Using focus group interviews and questionnaire assessments, we obtained detailed impressions of a diverse group of 75 pregnant women. Participants varied with respect to race/ethnicity, religious background, and reproductive history, as well as in their decisions about use of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing. Substantial variation surfaced in attitudes toward testing. Factors influencing women's views included available resources, feelings about having a child with Down syndrome, moral beliefs, family and social influences, perceptions of one's own health, the difficulty of becoming pregnant, and willingness to put the fetus at elevated miscarriage risk. Such findings indicate that age-based policies regarding access to prenatal diagnoses that, among other reasons, are based on the balance of risks between bearing a child with a chromosomal abnormality versus procedure-related loss are incompatible with the range of concerns that women bring to this decision and the weight individual women may assign to the outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 531
页数:11
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   UTILIZATION OF PRENATAL GENETIC DIAGNOSIS IN WOMEN 35 YEARS OF AGE AND OLDER IN THE UNITED-STATES, 1977 TO 1978 [J].
ADAMS, MM ;
FINLEY, S ;
HANSEN, H ;
JAHIEL, RI ;
OAKLEY, GP ;
SANGER, W ;
WELLS, G ;
WERTELECKI, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1981, 139 (06) :673-677
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1987, ANT DIAGN GEN DIS
[3]  
Beeson D, 1979, Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser, V15, P191
[4]  
DRUZIN ML, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V81, P615
[5]  
FADEN R, 1983, POPUL ENV BEHAV SOC, V6, P195
[6]   USING DECISION-ANALYSIS TO COMPARE POLICIES FOR ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR DOWNS-SYNDROME [J].
FLETCHER, J ;
HICKS, NR ;
KAY, JDS ;
BOYD, PA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7001) :351-356
[7]  
Gates E.A., 1994, WOMEN PRENATAL TESTI, P183
[8]  
Green Josephine, 1996, TROUBLED HELIX SOCIA, P140
[9]   CHOICE AS A DOUBLE-EDGED-SWORD - INFORMATION, GUILT AND MOTHER-BLAMING IN A HIGH-TECH AGE [J].
GREGG, R .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 1993, 20 (03) :53-73
[10]  
Huberman M., 1994, HDB QUALITATIVE RES, P428, DOI DOI 10.1108/03090560610681050