Meta-analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

被引:182
作者
Miltenburg, DM [1 ]
Miller, C [1 ]
Brunicardi, FC [1 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
breast cancer; sentinel lymph node; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1006/jsre.1999.5629
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive way to diagnose axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases in breast cancer. The most important features are ability to identify the SLN (I.D. rate), how often the SLN and ALN pathology match (concordance), and how often the SLN is negative for cancer when the ALNs are positive (false negative). Technique and patient criteria for SLNB vary among studies. This study performed meta-analysis of published studies to determine the I.D., concordance, and false negative rate (1) overall and for (2) both blue dye and radiocolloid, (3) the injection method, (3) palpable and nonpalpable ALNs, and (4) invasive and in situ disease. Methods. Inclusion criteria were patients with breast cancer who had SLNB followed by ALN dissection with H&E staining. Meta-analysis was performed using analysis of variance with each observation weighted inversely to its variance. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results. Eleven studies (n = 912) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 762 (84%) SLNs were identified, concordance was 747/762 (98%), and 15/296 (5%) were falsely negative. Highest I.D. rates (P < 0.05) were reported with albumin radiocolloid or dye + radiocolloid (97 and 94%, respectively), with injection around an intact tumor (96%), with invasive cancer (95%), and in the clinically negative axilla (96%). Concordance and false negative rates did not vary. Conclusions. The SLN can be identified in over 97% of patients if certain techniques and inclusion criteria are used. SLNB reflects the status of the axilla in 97% of cases and has a 5% false negative rate. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 142
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer [J].
Albertini, JJ ;
Lyman, GH ;
Cox, C ;
Yeatman, T ;
Balducci, L ;
Ku, NN ;
Shivers, S ;
Berman, C ;
Wells, K ;
Rapaport, D ;
Shons, A ;
Horton, J ;
Greenberg, H ;
Nicosia, S ;
Clark, R ;
Cantor, A ;
Reintgen, DS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 276 (22) :1818-1822
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, SURG ONCOLOGY CLIN
[3]   Clinical behavior of untreated axillary nodes after local treatment for primary breast cancer [J].
Baxter, N ;
McCready, D ;
Chapman, JA ;
Fish, E ;
Kahn, H ;
Hanna, W ;
Trudeau, M ;
Lickley, HL .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 3 (03) :235-240
[4]   Intradermal blue dye to identify sentinel lymphnode in breast cancer [J].
Borgstein, PJ ;
Meijer, S ;
Pijpers, R .
LANCET, 1997, 349 (9066) :1668-1669
[5]   ROENTGENOGRAPHIC VISUALIZATION OF HUMAN TESTICULAR LYMPHATICS - A PRELIMINARY REPORT [J].
BUSCH, FM ;
SAYEGH, ES .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1963, 89 (01) :106-&
[6]  
CABANAS RM, 1977, CANCER, V39, P456, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197702)39:2<456::AID-CNCR2820390214>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-I
[8]  
FISHER B, 1981, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V152, P765
[9]   Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer [J].
Giuliano, AE ;
Jones, RC ;
Brennan, M ;
Statman, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) :2345-2350
[10]   LYMPHATIC MAPPING AND SENTINEL LYMPHADENECTOMY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
GIULIANO, AE ;
KIRGAN, DM ;
GUENTHER, JM ;
MORTON, DL .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1994, 220 (03) :391-401