Managing advertising and promotion for long-run profitability

被引:234
作者
Jedidi, K [1 ]
Mela, CF
Gupta, S
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Coll Business Adm, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
long-term effects; promotions; advertising; price sensitivity; scanner data; choice; purchase quantity; switching regression;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.18.1.1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In recent years, manufacturers have become increasingly disposed toward the use of sales promotions, often at the cost of advertising. Yet the long-term implications of these changes for brand profitability remain unclear. In this paper, we seek to offer insights into this important issue. We consider the questions of i) whether it is more desirable to advertise or promote, ii) whether it is better to use frequent, shallow promotions or infrequent, deep promotions, and iii) how changes in regular prices affect sales relative to increases in price promotions. Additional insights regarding brand equity, the relative magnitude of short- and long-term effects, and the decomposition of advertising and promotion elasticities across choice and quantity decisions are obtained. To address these points, we develop a heteroscedastic, varying-parameter joint probit choice and regression quantity model. Our approach allows consumers' responses to short-term marketing activities to change in response to changes in marketing actions over the long term. We also accommodate the possibility of competitive reactions to policy changes of a brand. The model is estimated for a consumer packaged good category by using over eight years of panel data. The resulting parameters enable us to assess the effects of changes in advertising and promotion policies on sales and profits. Our results show that, in the long term, advertising has a positive effect on "brand equity" while promotions have a negative effect. Furthermore, we find price promotion elasticities to be larger than regular price elasticities in the short term, but smaller than regular price elasticities when longterm effects are considered. Consistent with previous research, we also find that most of the effect of a price cut is manifested in consumers' brand choice decisions in the short term, but when long-term effects are again considered, this result no longer holds. Last, we estimate that the long-term effects of promotions on sales are negative overall, and about two-fifths the magnitude of the positive short-term effects, Finally, making reasonable cost and margin assumptions, we conduct simulations to assess the relative profit impact of long-term changes in pricing, advertising, or promotion policies. Our results show regular price decreases to have a generally negative effect on the long-term profits of brands, advertising to be profitable for two of the brands, and increases in price promotions to be uniformly unprofitable.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 22
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Aaker DavidA., 2009, MANAGING BRAND EQUIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, VALUE EXCHANGE CONSU
[3]   HOW ADVERTISING AFFECTS SALES - META-ANALYSIS OF ECONOMETRIC RESULTS [J].
ASSMUS, G ;
FARLEY, JU ;
LEHMANN, DR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1984, 21 (01) :65-74
[4]  
Blattberg R.C., 1989, MARKET LETT, V1, P81, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00436151
[5]   HOW PROMOTIONS WORK [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
BRIESCH, R ;
FOX, EJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1995, 14 (03) :G122-G132
[6]  
Blattberg RobertC., 1990, Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods, and Strategies
[7]   MASTERING THE MIX - DO ADVERTISING, PROMOTION, AND SALES FORCE ACTIVITIES LEAD TO DIFFERENTIATION [J].
BOULDING, W ;
LEE, EY ;
STAELIN, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (02) :159-172
[8]   BRAND CHOICE, PURCHASE INCIDENCE, AND SEGMENTATION - AN INTEGRATED MODELING APPROACH [J].
BUCKLIN, RE ;
GUPTA, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1992, 29 (02) :201-215
[9]   Determining segmentation in sales response across consumer purchase behaviors [J].
Bucklin, RE ;
Gupta, S ;
Siddarth, S .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1998, 35 (02) :189-197
[10]  
BUCKLIN RE, 1998, MSI WORKING PAPER SE