Hydrostatic pressure induces conformational and catalytic changes on two alcohol dehydrogenases but no oligomeric dissociation

被引:38
作者
Dallet, S
Legoy, MD
机构
[1] Université de La Rochelle, Lab. de Genie Proteique et Cell., Pôle Sciences et Technologies, 17042 La Rochelle, Cedex 1, Avenue Marillac
来源
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEIN STRUCTURE AND MOLECULAR ENZYMOLOGY | 1996年 / 1294卷 / 01期
关键词
alcohol dehydrogenase; hydrostatic pressure; activation volume; (T-brockii); (yeast);
D O I
10.1016/0167-4838(95)00250-2
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A comparison between the pressure effects on the catalysis of Thermoanaerobium brockii alcohol dehydrogenase (TBADH: a thermostable tetrameric enzyme) and yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (YADH: a mesostable tetrameric enzyme) revealed a different behaviour. YADH activity is continuously inhibited by an increase of pressure, whereas YADH affinity seems less sensitive to pressure. TBADH activity is enhanced by pressure up to 100 MPa. TBADH affinity for alcoholic substrates increases if pressure increases, whereas TBADH affinity for NADP decreases when pressure increases. Hypothesis has been raised concerning the dissociation of oligomeric enzymes under high hydrostatic pressure (< 200 MPa) [1]. But in the case of these two enzymes, unless the oligomers reassociate very quickly (< 1 min), the activity inhibition of YADH at all pressures and TBADH for pressures above 100 MPa is not correlated to subunit dissociation. Hence we suggest that enzymes under pressure encounter a molecular rearrangement which can either have a positive or a negative effect on activity. Finally, we have observed that the catalytic behaviour of alcohol dehydrogenases under pressure is connected to their thermostability.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   THERMAL-STABILITY AND PROTEIN-STRUCTURE [J].
ARGOS, P ;
ROSSMANN, MG ;
GRAU, UM ;
ZUBER, H ;
FRANK, G ;
TRATSCHIN, JD .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1979, 18 (25) :5698-5703
[2]   EFFECTS OF HIGH-PRESSURE ON PROTEINS [J].
BALNY, C ;
MASSON, P .
FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 9 (04) :611-628
[3]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[4]  
Branden C-I., 1975, The Enzymes, V11, P103, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1874-6047(08)60211-5
[5]   A CORRELATION OF MOLECULAR FLEXIBILITY WITH VOLUME AND HEAT OF MIXING OF ORGANIC SOLUTES WITH WATER AND GLYCOL-WATER MIXTURE [J].
BROWER, KR ;
PESLAK, J ;
ELROD, J .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1969, 73 (01) :207-&
[6]  
CHALIKIAN TV, 1994, BIOPHYS CHEM, V51, P89, DOI 10.1016/0301-4622(94)85007-0
[7]   PRESSURE EFFECTS ON PROTEIN FLEXIBILITY MONOMERIC PROTEINS [J].
CIONI, P ;
STRAMBINI, GB .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1994, 242 (03) :291-301
[8]   REVERSIBLE HIGH HYDROSTATIC-PRESSURE INACTIVATION OF PHOSPHOFRUCTOKINASE FROM ESCHERICHIA-COLI [J].
DEVILLEBONNE, D ;
ELSE, AJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1991, 200 (03) :747-750
[9]   STUDY OF KINETICS AND MECHANISM OF YEAST ALCOHOL-DEHYDROGENASE WITH A VARIETY OF SUBSTRATES [J].
DICKINSON, FM ;
MONGER, GP .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1973, 131 (02) :261-270
[10]  
EKLUND H, 1981, J MOL BIOL, V146, P561, DOI 10.1016/0022-2836(81)90047-4