Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting Initiative: Incentives, Physician Work, and Perceived Impact on Patient Care

被引:20
作者
Duszak, Richard, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Saunders, Worth M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mid S Imaging & Therapeut, Memphis, TN 38120 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
Medical economics; radiology and radiologists; socioeconomic issues; pay for performance; physician incentives; quality and safety; metrics;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2009.12.011
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aims of this study were to compare incremental radiologist work to incremental financial incentives under Medicare's Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) and to evaluate physicians' perceptions of the program's impact on the quality of care. Methods: Medicare PQRI bonus information was acquired for 29 radiologists from a single practice over the program's first two cycles. Incremental bonus incentive percentages were calculated using total payments from Medicare and from all payers. Physicians were surveyed regarding incremental time required to participate and their perceptions of the program's impact on the quality of delivered care. Incentive data and survey results were analyzed and compared. Results: Despite ongoing educational and operational initiatives, mean physician Medicare PQRI incentives amounted to only 0.36% of total practice Medicare payment, well under Medicare's expected bonus of 1.5%. As a percentage of collections from all payers, PQRI bonuses amounted to just 0.11%, well less than the estimated 1.5% mean increase in overall physician work necessary for participation. Only 10 (34%) and 6 (21%) radiologists received bonuses each cycle, respectively, and only 1(3%) achieved bonuses for both cycles. Most physicians (76%) perceived that PQRI participation in no way improved the quality of radiologic services delivered. Conclusion: Even when aggressively pursued, Medicare's pay-for-performance program, PQRE, yields actual physician bonuses far less than those expected, more than an order of magnitude less than requisite incremental radiologist work, with little reported impact on quality. For such programs to engender ongoing physician participation, fundamental changes will be necessary to address discordantly low incentives and perceived lack of benefit to patient care.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 424
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Economic incentives in general practice: The impact of pay-for-participation and pay-for-compliance programs on diabetes care [J].
Bruni, Matteo Lippi ;
Nobilio, Lucia ;
Ugolini, Cristina .
HEALTH POLICY, 2009, 90 (2-3) :140-148
[2]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, PHYS QUAL REP ING IN
[3]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, QUAL REP IN WILL IMP
[4]  
de Brantes FS, 2009, AM J MANAG CARE, V15, P305
[5]  
Donnelly Lane F, 2007, J Am Coll Radiol, V4, P699, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.05.007
[6]  
Duszak R, 2009, J AM COLL RADIOL, V6, P731
[7]  
Duszak Richard Jr, 2009, J Am Coll Radiol, V6, P477, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.03.009
[8]   Cost to Primary Care Practices of Responding to Payer Requests for Quality and Performance Data [J].
Halladay, Jacqueline R. ;
Stearns, Sally C. ;
Wroth, Thomas ;
Spragens, Lynn ;
Hofstetter, Sara ;
Zimmerman, Sheryl ;
Sloane, Philip D. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2009, 7 (06) :495-503
[9]  
Larson Paul A, 2009, J Am Coll Radiol, V6, P731, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.08.004
[10]  
Lexa Frank J, 2008, J Am Coll Radiol, V5, P168, DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2007.09.016