Contact-evoked changes in EMG activity during human grasp

被引:26
作者
Collins, DF
Knight, B
Prochazka, A
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Div Neurosci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Anesthesiol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.1999.81.5.2215
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
2215 Cutaneous receptors in the digits discharge bursts of activity on contact with an object during human grasp. In this study, we investigated the contribution of this sensory activity to the responses of muscles involved in the task. Twelve subjects performed a standardized precision grasp task without the aid of vision. Electro-myographic (EMG) responses in trials when the object was present were compared with those in which the object, and hence the associated afferent responses, were unexpectedly absent. Significant differences in EMG amplitude occurred in the interval 50-100 ms after contact in all subjects and in 33/46 of the muscles sampled. The differences emerged as early as 34 ms after contact and comprised as much as a fourfold change in EMG from 50 to 100 ms after contact with the object. Typically, EMG responses were larger when the object was present (OP), though there were cases, particularly in the thenar muscles, in which the responses increased when the object was absent (OA). Local anesthesia of the thumb and index finger attenuated contact-evoked EMG activity in at least one muscle in all four subjects tested. In one subject, contact-evoked responses were abolished completely during the anesthesia in all four muscles sampled. The results indicate that the sensory activity signaling contact plays a key role in regulating EMG activity during human grasp. Much of this feedback action is attributable to cutaneous receptors in the digits and probably involves both spinal and supraspinal pathways.
引用
收藏
页码:2215 / 2225
页数:11
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   RESPONSE PROFILES OF HUMAN MUSCLE AFFERENTS DURING ACTIVE FINGER MOVEMENTS [J].
ALFALAHE, NA ;
NAGAOKA, M ;
VALLBO, AB .
BRAIN, 1990, 113 :325-346
[2]  
ALSTERMARK B, 1992, IBRO SER, P327
[3]   THE REPEATABILITY OF TESTING WITH SEMMES-WEINSTEIN MONOFILAMENTS [J].
BELLKROTOSKI, J ;
TOMANCIK, E .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 12A (01) :155-161
[4]   EFFECT OF TASK ON THE DEGREE OF SYNCHRONIZATION OF INTRINSIC HAND MUSCLE MOTOR UNITS IN MAN [J].
BREMNER, FD ;
BAKER, JR ;
STEPHENS, JA .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 66 (06) :2072-2083
[5]   CHARACTERISTICS OF KNEE JOINT RECEPTORS IN CAT [J].
BURGESS, PR ;
CLARK, FJ .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1969, 203 (02) :317-+
[6]   RESPONSES TO PASSIVE MOVEMENT OF RECEPTORS IN JOINT, SKIN AND MUSCLE OF THE HUMAN HAND [J].
BURKE, D ;
GANDEVIA, SC ;
MACEFIELD, G .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1988, 402 :347-361
[7]   Coordination of fingertip forces during human manipulation can emerge from independent neural networks controlling each engaged digit [J].
Burstedt, MKO ;
Edin, BB ;
Johansson, RS .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 117 (01) :67-79
[8]   Movement illusions evoked by ensemble cutaneous input from the dorsum of the human hand [J].
Collins, DF ;
Prochazka, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1996, 496 (03) :857-871
[9]  
COLLINS DF, 1996, CAN J PHYSL PHARM, V74, pAR7
[10]   TASK-DEPENDENT CHANGES IN THE SIZE OF RESPONSE TO MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN HUMAN 1ST DORSAL INTEROSSEOUS MUSCLE [J].
DATTA, AK ;
HARRISON, LM ;
STEPHENS, JA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1989, 418 :13-23