共 13 条
[1]
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND CONCLUSIONS IN REVIEWS OF SPINAL MANIPULATION
[J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION,
1995, 274 (24)
:1942-1948
[4]
FLEISS JL, 1982, STAT METHODS RATES P, P212
[5]
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?
[J].
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS,
1996, 17 (01)
:1-12
[7]
Laupacis A, 1998, TRANSFUSION MED, V8, P309
[9]
METAANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - A CONCERN FOR STANDARDS
[J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION,
1995, 274 (24)
:1962-1964
[10]
ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS - AN ANNOTATED-BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SCALES AND CHECKLISTS
[J].
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS,
1995, 16 (01)
:62-73