Siting restrictions and proximity of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations to surface water

被引:4
作者
Brands, Edwin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Environm Studies Program, Morris, MN 56267 USA
关键词
Concentrated Animal Feeding; Operations; Surface water quality; Siting restrictions; Manure spills; PHOSPHORUS CONSUMPTION; PIG PRODUCTION; MANURE; LOSSES; NUTRIENT; NITROGEN; IMPACTS; TRANSPORT; WASTE; COLI;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Proximity and connections to surface waters may play significant roles in determining impacts of manure spills. As occurred in many U.S. states, Minnesota adopted in 2000 more stringent regulations on Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) including restrictions on siting new facilities near surface waters. The objectives of this study were to determine whether CAFO proximity to surface waters decreased following the siting restrictions and to evaluate implications of siting restrictions. Permit dates, locations, and distances to nearest surface water bodies for 111 west central Minnesota CAFOs were determined based on satellite imagery, historical records, and correspondence with regulatory officials. Average distance between surface waters and facilities permitted after 2000 was greater than for facilities permitted before 2000. The increase in average distance between CAPOs and public surface waters was significant for open water (1790 m, p = 0.03), but not for streams (280 m, p = 0.47). Decreased CAFO proximity to surface waters should benefit water quality, but after 2000 facilities continued to be permitted close to hydraulic connections not covered by the siting restriction. Comprehensive manure spill tracking and long term targeted water quality monitoring are needed to evaluate effectiveness of siting restrictions and other strategies for protecting surface waters from manure spills. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 253
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Census of Agriculture, V1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1978, MINN RUL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MINN RUL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1971, MINN STAT REG
[5]  
Armstrong SD, 2010, SUSTAIN AGR REV, V4, P201, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-8741-6_7
[6]   Transport and Fate of Phosphorus during and after Manure Spill Simulations [J].
Armstrong, Shalamar D. ;
Smith, Douglas R. ;
Joern, Brad C. ;
Owens, Phillip R. ;
Leytem, April B. ;
Huang, C. ;
Adeola, Layi .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2010, 39 (01) :345-352
[7]  
Becker J.C., 2010, KY J EQUINE AGR NAT, V3, P71
[8]   Pathogens and manure management systems: A review [J].
Bicudo, JR ;
Goyal, SM .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 24 (01) :115-130
[9]   Impacts of waste from concentrated animal feeding operations on water quality [J].
Burkholder, JoAnn ;
Libra, Bob ;
Weyer, Peter ;
Heathcote, Susan ;
Kolpin, Dana ;
Thorne, Peter S. ;
Wichman, Michael .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 115 (02) :308-312
[10]   Toxigenic Pfiesteria species-Updates on biology, ecology, toxins, and impacts [J].
Burkholder, JoAnn M. ;
Marshall, Harold G. .
HARMFUL ALGAE, 2012, 14 :196-230